Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

MotorWeek - GM G-Body's 1986,87 with Sound !!

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,083
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 3, 2010

Motorweek's review of the G-Bodies. The 442 shown is really an 87'. It's ashame that GM didn't put the chev TPI 350 engines in the Chev & Yak' & have the olds with an olds 350 rocket with Fi !
Typical Monte SS performance #'s : 7.8 - 8.4 sec 0-60 , 15.6 - 16.4 sec 84 - 90mph for 1/4 mi ..
86-87 GN : 4.9-5.2 sec , 13.9-14.4 sec , 95-99mph
83-87 Hurst / 442 : 8.2- 9.5 sec , 16.0 - 16.8 sec , 80-84mph

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • look how young john was

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • coulda had more power:[ 

  • Yessss! I wanted to watch a Motorweek video about the Monte Carlo SS. Here it is! I had one of these cars many years ago untill some#@&*#$@ stole it. It's a shame they lacked real power.. But even now it is still a good looking car for me. Wish GM came back with a revised version of the SS and I'm not talking about FWD. A true RWD MC SS with a heritage throwback just like they did with the Camaro. I'll be the first in line. I'll keep waiting! JOHN DAVIS...Yopu're an ICON!

  • Wouldn't you really rather have a Buick?

  • This is AWESOME. I've been looking for this for some time. I thought that there was a test in '85 of the Buick GN - then of 200hp, the Monte SS and the 442. Real shame they didn't show the 442 1/4 mile numbers. BTW, the glass back was slower due to heavy window. Actually the original in '83/'84 with the 3spd THM 350 was the fastest, despite 3.42:1 rear gears vs. 3.73:1. The 200R couldn't put the power down right. T-Types and GNs burned them up.

  • I would love to see the 560SL test if you have it.

  • great video ....

  • 16.6 seconds in the 1/4! LOL!

  • its bad 3.8 has more then the v8

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more