Experts say that full body imaging machines would have detected the airline explosives, but critics say it robs passengers of their privacy. Daniel Sieberg shows us the fine line between privacy and security.
the "underwear bomber" went through the airport in Amsterdam, was he scanned at all? - Because they have the scanners in place there. So according to the CBS notes here "Experts say that full body imaging machines would have detected the airline explosives," but they DIDN'T did they - he was let onto the plane without a passport, expedited by a "handler" - so pretty obviously he wasn't scanned either. CBS - try reporting the NEWS, not propaganda fed to you by criminals. You have zero credibilty
politicians have their own scanners called eyes, this daily quran condoned bloodshed we see has not halted the last 14c, and what r they going to do if they see some underlying health problem, we need more hospital scanners n the world to open their eyes
@UBER069 hey you....STFU......stupid damn hippies.
wadad17 1 year ago
the "underwear bomber" went through the airport in Amsterdam, was he scanned at all? - Because they have the scanners in place there. So according to the CBS notes here "Experts say that full body imaging machines would have detected the airline explosives," but they DIDN'T did they - he was let onto the plane without a passport, expedited by a "handler" - so pretty obviously he wasn't scanned either. CBS - try reporting the NEWS, not propaganda fed to you by criminals. You have zero credibilty
UBER069 2 years ago
politicians have their own scanners called eyes, this daily quran condoned bloodshed we see has not halted the last 14c, and what r they going to do if they see some underlying health problem, we need more hospital scanners n the world to open their eyes
praskovia13 2 years ago
Body scanners use them. It is in the name of safety, to not get blown up.
gmcbuses 2 years ago
this is great..i want my flight safe...
mozrob2 2 years ago