Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Airline Scanner Debate

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,591
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 29, 2009

Experts say that full body imaging machines would have detected the airline explosives, but critics say it robs passengers of their privacy. Daniel Sieberg shows us the fine line between privacy and security.

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (9)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @UBER069 hey you....STFU......stupid damn hippies.

  • the "underwear bomber" went through the airport in Amsterdam, was he scanned at all? - Because they have the scanners in place there. So according to the CBS notes here "Experts say that full body imaging machines would have detected the airline explosives," but they DIDN'T did they - he was let onto the plane without a passport, expedited by a "handler" - so pretty obviously he wasn't scanned either. CBS - try reporting the NEWS, not propaganda fed to you by criminals. You have zero credibilty

  • politicians have their own scanners called eyes, this daily quran condoned bloodshed we see has not halted the last 14c, and what r they going to do if they see some underlying health problem, we need more hospital scanners n the world to open their eyes

  • Body scanners use them. It is in the name of safety, to not get blown up.

  • this is great..i want my flight safe...

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more