Marijuana Monopoly - ASA suggests getting rid of COMPETITION through RESTRICTIVE PERMITS

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
473 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Apr 22, 2011

ASA IS NOT ABOUT MEDICINE OR PATIENTS, IT IS ABOUT MONEY,
MOTHER EARTH COOPERATIVE IN EL CAJON IS THE ASA CASH COW IN SD, AGREEING TO TURN OVER ALL GROWER AND VENDOR INFO TO POLICE, NO WARRANT NEEDED, ATTORNEY LANCE ROGERS NEEDS A BAR COMPLAINT, THEY HAVE BEEN REPORTEDLY WORKING TO CLOSE DOWN ALL CITY STORES IN THE HOPES OF MAKING 50 - MILLION PER YEAR PLUS FOR THEIR POT MONOPOLY.
IS THIS WHAT YOU THOUGHT ASA STOOD FOR? Think again, that is why they want you to stick your head in the sand, they don't want you to know the truth.
"Stop the ban" was a diversion meant to run out the clock until the city council could enact the restrictive permitting which ASA founder Don Duncan lobbies for himself across the state. Restrictive Permitting Monopoly results in Official issueing permits to their friends, payoffs, and high prices for medical marijuana patients.
A brilliant business man, the real purpose of ASA is to protect his pot monopoly.
Don Duncan, pot mogul who founded "Americans for Safe Access" and now has what may be the largest pot-monopoly in California comes to San Diego to lecture at the City Council on how to invoke restrictive permitting as a way to "limit the proliferation of dispensaries". If you have a collective garden or your collective has a storefront you ought to open your eyes and ears

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (3)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why apply the corruption of monopoly to marijuana? It's suppose to be the average man's salvation and it's been turned into another greed tool. The clubs charge as much if not more than when hemp was on the street.

    It's just wrong to limit the number of people who can sell hemp, like it's wrong to limit the number of people who sell tomatoes.

    In the land of the free and the home of the brave, we've allowed ourselves to be reduced to govt. deciding who can hemp and who cannot. That's evil.

  • @sensibuddz Amen!

  • always some scumbag with a mountain of paperwork and his hand out. why can't people just treat this like a natural herb instead of a fuckin legal proceeding?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more