Youtube Copyright Nazi's
Uploader Comments (NikkiSixx15)
Top Comments
-
I just fell victim to copyright Nazis again. I used a song which is in Japanese, just used it and gave it English subtitles so people who don't know Japanese can understand what's going on.
The thing that pisses me off the most is how strict the copyright rules are here, but they won't do shit when it comes to spammers and trolls.
If there's anything we can do about copyright Nazis, I'll join the war against them.
All Comments (22)
-
@tbone2004 LOL oh George we all miss ya xD
-
107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
TAKE THAT COPYRIGHT NAZI TROLLS
HA!!
-
@danjuno You have no choice, you have owners. They own YOU.
They have owned us for a good long time, so this isn't something new.
-
youtube is run by a bunch of nazi's.. none of this content should be block as long as you are not making a profit from it and you clearly give credit to the owner of the copyrighted material... because it falls under the fair use law.. its the same reason why college kids can right essays and quote or use ideas from other works and not get sued for it.. all i got to say is fuck youtube and its nazi ass parent compay google.. there both CIA fronts anyways... pieces of shit..
-
We need to hire a squad of ninja assassin mercenaries and hunt their sorry asses down.
-
It's like old George Carlin said, You are property of the corporations, and there's nothing you can do.
-
I get annoyed whenever I or someone else makes a parody video and it gets removed because parody falls under the fair use doctrine. The Supreme Court of the United States stated that parody "is the use of some elements of a prior author's composition to create a new one that, at least in part, comments on that author's works." That commentary function provides some justification for use of the older work. YouTube apparently doesn't recognise the ruling of the Supreme Court.
-
Actually,what we need to do is to make our YouTube.
I know the copyright nazis are a problem. What pisses me off the most is that they remove audio in many videos.
MidnightPsychoKiller 2 years ago 3
@MidnightPsychoKiller then just leave the same song on other videos right? anyone else notice that cause they havent noticed the others...
NikkiSixx15 9 months ago