Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Roger Moore says "Don't Eat Foie Gras"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
41,126
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 13, 2009

James Bond star, Roger Moore, highlights the terrible cruelty of foie gras in this special PETA video. Roger encourages you to be kind and compassionate and avoid purchasing or consuming this vile product.

Find out about Roger's successful campaign to convince Selfridges to stop serving foie gras
http://blog.peta.org/archives/2009/11/sir_roger_moore.php

Information leaflet about foie gras
http://www.scribd.com/doc/20291570

If you are aware of restaurants in your area selling foie gras, please send them a link to this video and ask them to take it off the menu.

Thank you for caring about the ducks and geese.

*** We love you Roger Moore ***

  • likes, 17 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Video Responses

This video is a response to Roger Moore's hilarious Niven story
see all

All Comments (165)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ModestMojoVanishes me neither, but let me just say that who is to say that you are being "cautious" by believing in what you do? and you are also hanging on to "rights"; the "rights" we give to non human animals

  • @an50331 Well, I don't think we'll converge. I don't believe in historical/cultural/traditiona­l arguments. I hold that there are moral absolutes. I'm arguing that it has always been wrong to treat animals badly (btw killing wasn't always bad), and even if I can't prove that, it's a very good axiom to live by - erring on the side of caution doesn't harm anything, whereas doggedly hanging onto 'rights' frequently does.

    I've no more to say in this discussion, which I've quite enjoyed.

  • i understand where you are coming from. i personally wouldn't eat foie gras, but i still believe people should have the right to do so. people have been eating foie gras for thousands of years, its intertwine with culture. and i don't believe we have the right to change that, because our culture sees it as "morally" wrong.

    i find it hypocritical that we pick and choose what animals to protect. if you were born eating foie gras, you would see it as a human right

  • @an50331 I agree regarding the law - but who makes the law? - human beings (obvious, but it is central to the problem here). Don't you find it troubling that, in order to satisfy an immoral market and make financial profits, grotesque suffering has to be inflicted on creatures. The key concept here is suffering, which I maintain no human has the right to inflict on any creature. This is much more important than satisfying appetites and protection from legal prosecution.

  • @ModestMojoVanishes there is a huge inconsistency in current law. in some cases, animals have rights (depending on the animal) and in others, we could care less.

    so its either property, or it has rights. if you are to give it rights, it should have the same rights as a human, if you dont then its property.

    people have the right to do as they wish to their property as long it doesn't hurt others (i.e. people... who have rights)

    sounds like self righteous bs for only the cute and cuddly animals

  • @LairdDrambeg Like most YT trolls, you avoid the argument by scatter-gunning personal abuse. I'm sure they'd agree - Roger Moore's celebrity status and acting ability are irrelevant here; and PETA might have some questions to answer regarding euthanasia. The only thing that matters is that millions of creatures are tortured to sastisfy the appetites - not needs - of solipsistic hedonists, some of whom even revel publicly in their debauchery.

  • @an50331 Right to do as they wish to their property?? On the contrary, legal ownership of an animal should not confer rights except to prevent theft. Ownership should entail RESPONSIBILITIES, including putting the animal's welfare first. If the owner can't or won't do that, then they should not keep the animal, but have it re-homed to a place where it will be looked after properly. This includes ALL animals. There is no 'right' to torture any creature.

  • @hellokellyable stupid isnt the same thing as insensitive. some people just dont care, and it is there right to do as they wish to their property

  • you people making these heartless stupid comments, if you're not with the issue then take your ass somewhere else. Jesus. This is an excellent film, VERY well done. I applaud Roger Moore. He has ALWAYS spoken his mind and tried to educate us stupid, insensitive humans to the issues no one wants to talk about.

  • fuck those gooses, stuff the fuck out of them... mmmm tasty liver

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more