Praxeology - Episode 2 - Methodology

In this episode I will present Praxeology's method of studying human behavior as distinguished from the methods of the natural sciences.

Please remember to subscribe and add this channel feed to your RSS readers. New episodes will be posted weekly.

Share the show's address! http://www.praxeology.tv
Like me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/praxgirl
Follow me on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/praxgirl
Read my blog and find episode archives: http://www.praxgirl.com

Donations: I currently accept two forms of donations and really appreciate your help funding the show!
Paypal (depending on size of donation, will be promptly converted to a sound money (Bitcoin, Silver or Gold): https://www.paypal.com/cgi-bin/webscr?cmd=_s-xclick&hosted_button_id=3R78...
My youtipit account for those new to Bitcoin: http://www.youtipit.org/t/J3561
or
My Bitcoin Address: 1EEGdU6trKh6tmZqV94Uo1rgkNJVKTeLZ2

Category:

Education

Tags:

• methodology
• method
• empiricism
• vs
• methodological
• individualism
• study
• priori
• deduction
• logic
• praxeology
• praxgirl
• science
• human
• action
• pencil
• spontaneous
• order
• classes
• lessons
• markets
• educational
• school
• of
• thought
• catallactics
• Праксиоло́гия
• Prakseologia
• Praxeologie
• Praxeología
• Praksiologiya
• Praxeologi
• Праксеологія
• 人類行為學

[gregologynet]

Am I right in thinking that human actions differ from the actions of atoms because each human has a reason for their actions whereas an atom is just acting randomly?

[DrPhallus]

It's all very... religious, there's a good deal of 'scientist' bashing going on here.

[jeffiek]

@TheHomoludens No, I will not excuse you for personal attacks.

The ad hominem attack ranks among the despicable among those that don't have any argument to present.

Insults are quite another thing. I occasionally use them myself although I typically find that accurate descriptions are sufficient.

Idiot.

[TheHomoludens]

@zamkam And excuse me for regressing to personal attacks, too, but:

just have a look at "praxeology - episode 1" top comment to see about the maturity of thought brought to us by praxgirl and her followers.

Wanking highschool kids sucking on propaganda tits!

[TheHomoludens]

@zamkam "I wonder if she's ever read a basic logic book."

Of course she hasn´t - just provideing a nice fassade.

As soon as you start critizising "Austrian thought" you´ll be attacked 1. by young devotees in an emotional way with a lot of personal attacks, 2. by intellectually more trained persons, who still regress to personal attacks, most highly cynical, 3. by the "trained thinkers" who use big words to describe that only their perspective can be logic, while not defining anything.

Sophism...

[TheHomoludens]

@zamkam Don´t bother trying to really argue with those "individualistic thinkers" who identify themselves as "Austrian thinkers" or "praxeologists".

Their epistemology ("what can I be sure of?") and ontology ("what is there (that is knowable)?") is simply nonexistant.

Those who rant against this statement will propably regress to the ever same tautologies...

[TheHomoludens]

@jeffiek And anyone who ever heard what "tautology" means, will find the praxeology is based on one.

Pseudo-science!

[jeffiek]

@zamkam You don't need to read a whole book. A single page on the internet reveals you to be an idiot

wikipedia. org/wiki/Proof_by_contradictio­n

[jeffiek]

@zamkam "Then if you say "All humans disagree with me" ..."

Do you know what the word ALL means?

ONE person trying to prove your bullshit wrong is not ALL person.

Such stupidity as yours doesn't even rise to the level of error. Error implies the attempt to be correct.

[ReasonAndLiberty]

@zamkam I'm not sure that her statement of the axiom was as it was given originally... The version I've heard is "humans act."