Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

WTC7 collapse compared with NIST's no-impact-damage model

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
5,545
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 28, 2008

WTC7 collapse compared with NIST's no-impact-damage model

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (17)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Sesame Street song: One of these things is not like the other.........You get the point! 911 was an inside job.

  • Why doesn't somebody use the software NIST used with a model of WT7 and blow out 18 floors in a controlled demolition sequence?

    Bet you it looks like the real life video

  • It's all a mind game people.Hidden in plain sight. Iv said it ad nauseum.They wana know who they can sucker and for how long.This run's deep.The longer 1 takes to wake up from this little fantasy game their playing on you,the rougher it's gonna be to accept U got played when U do.Don't embarrass yourself like that.

  • they couldnt get models to work coz there is more to this story!

  • @hgfbob no doubt about that

  • as soon as the kink is formed, the HVAC, 'other' Penthouse, roof, facade, within 0.5 seconds from each other, have free fall ACCELERATION for 100+ft. ALL support was INSTANTLY taken away, AS WE SEE by the EVEN decent

    if there was a progression from east to west

    WE WOULD SEE IT

    the roof WILL NOT support itself while columns fail below it. the facade is a non supporting structure, and IS attached to the perimeter columns it will not stand while the columns fail behind it.

  • NIST's secret

  • you compare Oranges with apples.

    the sim you used in the video is the sim without the outer shell of the building.

    The sim is a sim of the NIST fantasy from INSIDE the building. so its not comparable.

  • The simulation and the actual event are not the same. Anyone who can't see that should check it out a couple of times, checking the computer simulation on the right, compared to the actual event, on the left. Is anyone arguing that these two things are a match? Hope not.

  • i have a sneaking suspision if myth busters did anything on this it would have to back up popular mechanics regardless of any facts. besides you seen the bullet shot straight in the air episode? joke!

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more