Aristotle stolen by Darwin εγωιστή

Aristotle's Life EVOLUTION Climax:
'Nature EVOLVES in a continuous gradation from soulless to animals, through the living beings that are not animals (p.ex. leaves as food, microorganisms), with the result that the akin living beings are so close to each other that their difference seems infinitesimal'. (Α-Ι, On the Parts of Animals 681, α31).
Αριστοτέλη, συνοπτική ιστορία τής ΕΞΕΛΙΞΗΣ της ζωής:
Η φύση ΕΞΕΛΙΣΣΕΤΑΙ με συνέχεια από τα άψυχα στα ζώα, διαμέσου των ζώντων που δεν είναι ζώα (π.χ. φύλλα ως τροφή, μικροοργανισμοί), με αποτέλεσμα τα συγγενή μεταξύ τους έμβια όντα διαφέρουν ελάχιστα. (Α-Ι, περί Ζώων Μορίων 681, α31).

Anaximander:' "Ηumans EVOLVED from fishes".
Αναξίμανδρος: Οι άνθρωποι ΕΞΕΛΙΧΘΗΚΑΝ από τα ψάρια.

Ο διακριτικός αμεσοδημοκρατικός υμνητής ΣΥΜΦΙΛΙΩΣΗΣ και ΑΥΤΑΡΚΕΙΑΣ: 'Πολιτικά', 'Αθ. Πολ.'.
The cautious direct-democrat, praiser of CONCILIATION and AUTARKY: 'Politics', 'Athen. Constitution'

Darwin did not promote respect for his inspirators. Humankind still waits reconciliatory autarky, that egoists hate. Everyone is judged by all his works. Darwin was an anti-democrat monarchist, and self-destroying feardom is not the best human adaptation.
As Darwin, instead of BENEFICIAL MUTUAL-AID, supported fovik egoism-continuous aggression (that DESTROYED faraos, Myceneans, Pelleans, Romans, Mayans, crusaders, Aztecs, Incas etc) as 'natural' 'selection', thus he confused more people. Aren't cool-headed+luckiest GROUPS the usual survivers?
Ο μοναρχικός Δαρβίνος, αντί για την ΕΥΕΡΓΕΤΙΚΗ ΑΛΛΗΛΟΒΟΗΘΕΙΑ, αποκάλεσε τον φοβικό εγωισμό και τη συνεχή επιθετικότητα "φυσική επιλογή", για να δικαιολογήσει γενοκτονίες...
Aristotle for natural selection: "When the teeth grow in just this (suitable) way, then the animal survives. When they do not, then the animal dies. More directly, and more explicitly, the way the teeth grow is not for the sake of the animal, and its survival or its death is just a coincidence (Phys. 198 b 29-32).
Ο Αριστοτέλης για την εξέλιξη: ένα ζώο δεν αποκτά χαρακτηριστικά λόγω σχεδίου, αλλά μπορεί να τύχει να έχει κάποια που το βοηθούν σε κάποια περίπτωση να επιβιώσει. (Περί φύσεως, 198 b 29-32).

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Δαρβίνος
• εξέλιξη
• δαρβινιστές
• δημιουργιστές
• άμεση_δημοκρατία
• Χρυσοί-Αιώνες_Θάρρους
• Golden_Centuries_Courage
• επιστήμη
• ανθρωπολογία
• Anaximander
• anthropology
• darwinism
• racism

[peacearchanthropuses]

Archimedes was referred to show [roman etc] arrogance results. As Darwin too, supported egoism-continuous aggression (that DESTROYED turbid faraos, Myceneans, Pelleans, Romans, Mayans, crusaders, Aztecs, Incas etc) as 'natural' 'selection', instead of mutual-aid, he confused more people. Aren't cool-headed+luckiest GROUPS the usual survivers?

[TheFallibleFiend]

Lots of people had ideas for evolution before Darwin. Anyone who's done a day's honest research knows this, including Darwin's great modern admirers. What Darwin (and Wallace) provided were a mechanism. Did Aristotle discover natural selection?

[peacearchanthropuses]

So, friend, we should say: Anthropology founder (slandered) Aristotle spoke about EVOLUTION (see info; he died sad when Democracy sapped in -322), Romans etc killed Archimedeses, and those who hush-up history are not honest. Darwin offered a lot, but did not promote respect for his inspirators. Humankind still waits reconciliatory autarky, that egoists hate. Everyone is judged by all his works. Darwin was an anti-democrat monarchist, and self-destroying feardom is not the best human adaptation.

[MakisPyrgiotis]

"Whether Darwin was anti-democratic has nothing to do with natural selection."

I WOULD RECONSIDER THIS QUOTE, FROM THE MESSAGE ABOVE.

NOT AS IT PERTAINS TO DARWIN, RATHER DARWINISM, AS CULTURE (IN OUR SPECIES) HAS HAD A MAJOR IMPACT, ON THE SURVIVAL OF CULTURES IN OUR PAST, AND WILL UNDOUBTEDLY CONTINUE TO IMPACT OR SPECIES IN THE FUTURE.

[peacearchanthropuses]

Aristotle for natural selection: "When the teeth grow in just this (suitable) way, then the animal survives. When they do not, then the animal dies. More directly, and more explicitly, the way the teeth grow is not for the sake of the animal, and its survival or its death is just a coincidence (Phys. 198 b 29-32).

[TheFallibleFiend]

It's not clear that Darwin was in fact inspired by Archimedes. There were others to whom he was much more beholden. Whether Darwin was anti-democratic has nothing to do with natural selection.