ABC - Barry Jennings interview

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
2,979
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 16, 2009

No description available.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Gideon52480)

  • In a controlled demolition all explosive charges go off simultaneously.

    These video clips prove nothing.

    One would expect to hear explosions after planes crash into 110 storey skyscrapers. Gas pipes bursting etc.

  • Hey genius, you forgot to take into account he was in building 7, not the towers.  You remember WTC 7, right? The building that collapsed 8 hours after the attack into its own footprint. The building that no airplane ever hit?

  • You guys ever gonna share the full length coverage?

  • what do you mean? Isn't that it?

see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @BrideAndGroomFilmsHD My brother is demo expert, he says you can see a obvious "kremp" (idk how it's spelled) in the middle, which is basically the first charge that explodes so the building will fall in on itself instead of onto nearby structures, they also mention people to "pull" shortly before it falls, which is a demo term, and a steel framed building falling from fire and some debris? what?

  • @luismanuel1978 I ignorant? Me have brain? Yes, me have brain. Why ask you?

    I take it you believe that 9/11 was an "inside job"?  Is that the case? If so, what is your evidence for that claim?

  • @BrideAndGroomFilmsHD You ignorant!!!!!!! DO YOU HAVE BRAIN?

  • they killed barry..!!!

  • @tmart1993 Hmmm.. Not so sure about that. I'm no controlled demolition expert but if you compare the collapse for the three towers on 9/11 with an actual controlled demolition, it looks nothing like it.

  • @BrideAndGroomFilmsHD Your information is faulse, there are normally 3 seperate explosions. One at the core, one at the lateral sides of the beams, and then the top of the beams

  • 1:27 ... So did he set the explosives?

  • Yes, building 7 didn't have a plane hit it, but a large portion of the building was scooped out by falling debris from other buildings and its structure was weakened by fire. This is the most obvious explanation.

    Admittedly, it does fall kind of "funny looking", but it doesn't look like a controlled demolition either. There are no visible explosive charges. I also must ask where the steel structural columns are? Very strange.

    But until I see more evidence, I'm not jumping to conclusions.

  • It's funny that you call me a "genius" for simply asking questions. If you have any evidence that 9/11 was an inside job, I'd be happy to take a look. All you're doing is arriving at conclusions that, when thought about more deeply, are not the proper conclusions.

    I merely commented on controlled demolition. It makes no sense to think that because people heard "explosions" that that means 9/11 was an inside job. In a controlled demolition, all explosives go off simultaneously.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more