Franklin D. Roosevelt "Four Freedoms" Speech - January 6, 1941
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to like ClassicNewsClips's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to dislike ClassicNewsClips's video.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in with your Google Account (YouTube, Google+, Gmail, Orkut, Picasa, or Chrome) to add ClassicNewsClips's video to your playlist.
Uploaded on Feb 25, 2010
January 6, 1941: President Franklin Delano Roosevelt addresses a joint session of Congress in his "Four Freedoms" speech.
-
Category
-
License
Standard YouTube License
Loading...
Loading...
Loading...
The interactive transcript could not be loaded.
Loading...
Loading...
Ratings have been disabled for this video.
Rating is available when the video has been rented.
This feature is not available right now. Please try again later.
Loading...
-
4:48
America Declares War on Japan - President Roosevelt Speech [Full Resolution]by The British Pathé War ArchivesFeatured
104,516
-
15:46
Untold History: Early US Imperialism, Hitler, Roosevelt, The Spanish Civil Warby The Real News Network
20,019 views
-
9:05
Franklin D Roosevelt's speech after Pearl Harborby GeneralWAS
11,393 views
-
7:59
Sept. 20, 2001 - Bush Declares War on Terrorby ConspiracyWorld
411,053 views
-
1:00:20
Andrew Norton Webber on A Fireside Chat - Fluoride & Liquid Therapies - November 12th, 2011by ZanyMysticRadio
8,871 views
-
17:28
Martin Luther King - I Have A Dream Speech - August 28, 1963by sullentoys
2,759,025 views
-
7:45
Day of Infamy speechby rexlibris99
127,911 views
-
40
videos
Play all
Franklin D. Rooseveltby northmeister
-
7:42
FDR Dies, 1945by newsreelarchive
40,393 views
-
6:48
Stalin speech - November 7, 1941[English subtitles]by lazarodesouzagomes
642,034 views
-
17:48
JFK - We choose to go to the Moon, full lengthby Plasma Ben
631,902 views
-
1:11:32
Ike {1 of 2}by HistoryFeed
50,388 views
-
10:04
President George H.W. Bush State of the Union Address - January 29, 1991 (Part 2/5)by ClassicNewsClips
1,127 views
-
57:16
George Kavassilas on A Fireside Chat - Synthetic Light & Darkness - March 2nd, 2013by ZanyMysticRadio
6,096 views
-
9:44
I welcome their hatred F D Rooseveltby Brent Abrahamson
51,889 views
-
9:53
FDR "The Fala Speech"by KodaCodec
67,692 views
-
3:18
FDR 1936 I welcome their hatredby FrajAce
74,942 views
-
2:25
Countdown w/ Keith Olbermann - Old Graphics/Introby ClassicNewsClips
1,287 views
-
2:01
FDR Second Bill of Rights Speech Footageby KillWill3
122,140 views
-
7:04
President Franklin D. Roosevelt First Inaugural Addressby EVGINC
64,099 views
-
10:30
President George H.W. Bush State of the Union Address - January 29, 1991 (Part 3/5)by ClassicNewsClips
584 views
- Loading more suggestions...
All Comments (58)
Derp McHerpton 3 weeks ago
1:30 auto captions: "and in fetuses"
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
HaisenbergBG 3 months ago
Bill Jahnel made me watch this......what kind of bias is he demonstrating?
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
grandoldpyro 3 months ago
This was given during WW2. FDR was not stupid, he knew that the U.S. would be involved at some point.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
ccfromnj 10 months ago
I am not the sharpest tool in the took box, But... President Roosevelt starts off talking about making more '...munitions and war supplies of many kinds...' (2:00) and ends with the '...World wide reduction in armament...' (6:25). And I am 'Far Left' and a fan of FDR. !
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fiveinslide6 1 year ago
The founders were in agreement in keeping the federal government out of our lives; they only disagreed about how best to do it. The reason some didn't want a bill of rights was only that they feared judges would interpret it to mean that we only had those rights mentioned in those amendments so the government was free to attack us in every other way. That's the opposite of what both camps wanted. They both wanted a strict leash on government.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fiveinslide6 1 year ago
Honestly, George Washington wasn't the great philosopher of our founders but he had tremendous personal integrity and fully understood what our Constitution was about when he issued his Thanksgiving Proclamation. He was flaunting the fact that the 1st Amendment has an actually subject, verb and object limiting its scope. Today, too many people pretend judges get to invent new, more expansive subjects, verbs and objects for any law they fee like, whenever they want. It's tyranny.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
fiveinslide6 1 year ago
A ban on exports starts a trade war. As for bulbs, don't be silly. Any lead in an incandescent is solidly attached to the base--no health hazard--and fluorescents have a lot of mercury in dust form; not lead. You need to call hazmat to clean that up or you will eventually breathe it all in. Once you breathe it in, it stays in you.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Ryan Mitchell 1 year ago
people made the argument that it was overbearing, allowed to much control by the wealthy as well as many other arguments. There were many different views as to what should be put in the constitution. GW did not like the idea of entering into foreign wars yet many people of his time did and still many people today do. You can see his opinion about this in his Farewell Address as well as his Proclamation of Neutrality.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Ryan Mitchell 1 year ago
The anti federalist founding fathers did. The federalist founding fathers had no original intention of putting in a bill of rights. You can read this in many history text books. You seem to believe that the founding fathers all had the same consenting opinion. The day of the ratification of the constitution was a bunch of politicians holding hands and jumping around in fields of flowers, clouds and rainbows. This is not the case. The constitution took 4 years to finally be accepted and many
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube
Ryan Mitchell 1 year ago
I never said i defended it. I only point at the other side of the argument. You can not oppose policy by pointing at the negative either as you often do.
Sign in to YouTube
Sign in to YouTube