tyson vs tillis part 4

10 rds part #4

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• tyson
• james
• tillis
• iron
• mike

[RaulGroom]

@ferrarimike23 every time a fighter loses, his fans claim it's because he was old, or he wasn't trained, or he was on drugs, or whatever excuse you want. Tyson was the typical bully that seemed invincible until he lost. If you go back and look, his weaknesses were always there, waiting for the right fighter on the right night to exploit them. There's a reason Mike never regained the lineal title. He wasn't nearly as good as we thought he was when he was KOing bums in the late 1980's.

[chrissline77]

@RaulGroom ..........You're wrong. Mike Tyson took down big in shape fighters like, Frank Bruno and James BONE "CRUSHER" Smith. He knocked out Trevor Berbick. They were all big, accurate, and durable. And they loss.

[ferrarimike23]

You either love Tyson or you don't the people that don't like Tyson will disregard the fact that Tyson obviously wasn't training like he should have been during the buster fight. And he just really didn't have the fire or the need to please anybody like he had before cus died and before he got rid of Rooney the people who hate mike will disregard the fact that all his other losses he was way out of his prime and just a shadow of his former self. with mikes fighting style you have to be in tip t

[ferrarimike23]

Raul

You can believe what you want body. But Tyson was way out of his prime with 2 of those fighters and with buster he just didn't have the fire to execute offensively or defensively and by your analogy you must not watch much combat sports. Suppose a man wins then a rematch happens and the otherguy wins it happens all the time that proves you can control 90% of a fight the other 10% is luck sometimes you get caught other times u dont

[RaulGroom]

@iljn1988 Athletes always try to find tactical reasons for losing, because that's how athletes think. It's not necessarily about making excuses - they tend naturally to assume the reasons for losing are things under their control. In reality there are often elements of a matchup that strongly favor one fighter over the other. In-shape Douglas was a bad matchup for Tyson, as was Holyfield, as was Lennox Lewis. Any fighter who was big, accurate, and durable was a major problem for Mike.

[EVILSPAWN1000]

@iljn1988 Well,it`s funny how Tysons skills (not even slowly) eroded after Rooney left.His FIRST FIGHT (Bruno) without Rooney u could see canges for the worse.I`m not gonna take away anything from Douglas,he fought a spectacular fight that night.And all things concidered:Tyson HAD the mantion,he HAD 10 supercars,he HAD "everything" including the idea that he was untouchable and indestructibe.And now at 45 he says this.Many men have whooped him since then.Why would he make excuses 4 that 1 fight?

[iljn1988]

@EVILSPAWN1000, I've seen it, and as I said, Tyson just saying it afterwards doesn't make it true. Most fighters make up excuses afterwards if they get beaten. If Tyson was in the awful shape some claim he wouldn't have made it to the second half of the fight, because Douglas was hammering him. Doesn't excuse the loss, just saying.

[EVILSPAWN1000]

@iljn1988 Tyson himself saiying that he did nothing but f**k japanese girls and have a few training sessions before a crowd and press.And this he said in the movie from 2009 where he owns his mistakes and in no way tries to blame anyone else but himself for what happened.is that proof good enough?"Tyson"(2009 J.Toback) A great and brutally honest docu. on Tyson WITH Tyson

[ghns1133]

@iljn1988

ur the one who said "do u have any idea how stupid i sound" so what did u expect? for me to want to be your new bff?

[iljn1988]

@ghns1133, I've read that book, and it's nothing but conjecture, speculation and fantasy. Awful book. Yeah, Tyson was 260 lb two weeks before the fight and 220 lb on fight night. Of course he was. No need to get so touchy, by the way. That time of the month or something?