2004 Mazda 6s 3.0 V6 0-60 in Drive with Brake-Torquing

I brake torqued in this video, but it seemed to be slower. The Beltronics Vector FX2 confirmed a time of 7.78 seconds, which is about a second slower than this car is capable of. Once again, I'm filming these videos on an abandoned airport, so the surface is very unkempt, not ideal for these tests.

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• Abandoned
• Airport
• Runway
• 2004
• Mazda
• 3.0
• Liter
• Litre
• V6
• Cylinder
• Engine
• automobiles
• engine
• high
• speed
• extreme
• driving

[hellcat320]

what a bag of shit. get that garbage off the road.

[coolerdude44]

@hellcat320 because it's a "chink car made in bangcock"? get off my videos you shit-head.

[aviy93]

hmm...still a pretty good time.  nice run!

[coolerdude44]

@aviy93 nah haha that's almost a second slower than the manufacturer claim

[wolf1010]

@hellcat320 Your civic is not even as fast as this car usually is stock. And you drive and older civic, not exactly glamorous. Cocky mother fucker aren't you?

[METALMUNKEEZ]

I installed a Short ram intake, use K&N oil filter, with Castrol Synthetic 5-20W but still with crappy pre cats and no exhaust. moved it up to a heavier 18" rims(stupid i know) but managed to bring the 0-60 to 6.4. no brake torquing.

[nevex84]

@alamrisa amazing , some drivetrain problems but overall amazing car

[alamrisa]

i'm thinking about buying this car... how is it in terms of reliability?

[wolf1010]

@hellcat320 Just like you don't give a shit about that crap I reject, we don't give a shit about that crap you say. And it has to be at least 80% of youtube comments claiming they have some mod on their car usually is a simple lie. That's the joy of the internet.

[hellcat320]

@wolf1010 haha the vid up there is old.... shes turbo'd now puttin down 278 to the wheels @7800rpm and 193lbs-ft. suck it. as for older, waaay nicer than the new ones they are ugly as balls, and you might want to be glamorous like furgy but I dont give a shit about that crap you reject.