(R) John Dennis Vs Nancy Pelosi in 2010

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
4,285
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (230)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 80.1% of the people in San Francisco are idiots. No wonder eveyone jumps off the Golden Gate! I would too if everyone thought electing Pelosi is a good idea.

  • Dammit, Dennis should have won

  • We all knew that Dennis had no chance of winning (which is very sad that San Francisco is so bitterly partisan and senile).

    Libertarianism is a conservative viewpoint, actually.

  • "I didn't realize there were any Republicans that were allowed to be outside of the exact party lines." Oh dear god. Can you just suck my balls sac you partisan hack douchebag? Like every Demcorat is from the same mold? Please. What's refreshing is to come across a Democrat who believes the 2nd extends rights to the individual and who don't believe in thought policing the populace via "PC" speak. Die in fire fuckwad.

  • @allgoo19

    I would HIGHLY recommend that you go to mises dot org and read up on some of the stuff there. Perhaps check out Hayek, Hazlitt, maybe some Rothbard...Anatomy of the State would probably be a good beginning. I have NO problem with you wanting to have socialized medicine or retirement pensions etc. I just don't want to be forced into them. Show tolerance to other people's ideas rather than trying to use the govt to force them to get what you want. That's pretty intolerant and corporate

  • @allgoo19

    "They buy their privileges that often violate "Individual Liberty" of others."

    Yes they do. The best methodology they've figured out thus far is to use the State to help accomplish what they want via the regulatory system and other legal machinations of the State. Again, what YOU want is to concentrate power into the hands of a small group of people that are WAY more prone to corruption and can exact WAY more harm to the economy than any one corporation could EVER hope to achieve.

  • @JojahBoy

    "Individual Liberty is important is important bro.."

    Ok, I'm getting what's wrong with the way you think.

    Corporates are not individuals and they don't have "Individual Liberty".

    They buy their privileges that often violate "Individual Liberty" of others.

    If you still don't understand it, I'll try to explain it to you in other ways.

  • @JojahBoy

    "And honestly, what you .."

    Let me try to understand this.

    You point is "I know a few regulation that were sponsored by the corporates for their advantage, so ALL the regulation have to be eliminated."

    Is this correct?

  • @JojahBoy

    "As for which country it's working in.."

    So, your answer is "No country"? Is that right? You can't tell one country without regulation but you want US to try it, correct?

    I can tell you many occasions very close to what you call "Actual Free Market" and all failed in disater.

    Make your comment one a t a time, otherwise it'll become very confusing, unlessthat's your goal. I'm not reading the rest.

    Keep it simple.

  • @allgoo19

    Lastly, many want to concentrate power into the hands of a few people, basically promoting a monopoly (of the use of force in the State's case). Rather than allowing people their freedom to choose to be part of their economic ideologies they seem to want to use the violent nature of the state to force others to adhere to what they think is best. That's not very tolerant and is responsible for tens of millions dead in the last century. Individual Liberty is important is important bro.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more