80.1% of the people in San Francisco are idiots. No wonder eveyone jumps off the Golden Gate! I would too if everyone thought electing Pelosi is a good idea.
"I didn't realize there were any Republicans that were allowed to be outside of the exact party lines." Oh dear god. Can you just suck my balls sac you partisan hack douchebag? Like every Demcorat is from the same mold? Please. What's refreshing is to come across a Democrat who believes the 2nd extends rights to the individual and who don't believe in thought policing the populace via "PC" speak. Die in fire fuckwad.
I would HIGHLY recommend that you go to mises dot org and read up on some of the stuff there. Perhaps check out Hayek, Hazlitt, maybe some Rothbard...Anatomy of the State would probably be a good beginning. I have NO problem with you wanting to have socialized medicine or retirement pensions etc. I just don't want to be forced into them. Show tolerance to other people's ideas rather than trying to use the govt to force them to get what you want. That's pretty intolerant and corporate
"They buy their privileges that often violate "Individual Liberty" of others."
Yes they do. The best methodology they've figured out thus far is to use the State to help accomplish what they want via the regulatory system and other legal machinations of the State. Again, what YOU want is to concentrate power into the hands of a small group of people that are WAY more prone to corruption and can exact WAY more harm to the economy than any one corporation could EVER hope to achieve.
Lastly, many want to concentrate power into the hands of a few people, basically promoting a monopoly (of the use of force in the State's case). Rather than allowing people their freedom to choose to be part of their economic ideologies they seem to want to use the violent nature of the state to force others to adhere to what they think is best. That's not very tolerant and is responsible for tens of millions dead in the last century. Individual Liberty is important is important bro.
80.1% of the people in San Francisco are idiots. No wonder eveyone jumps off the Golden Gate! I would too if everyone thought electing Pelosi is a good idea.
freakylocz14 10 months ago
Dammit, Dennis should have won
lukegreen37 11 months ago
We all knew that Dennis had no chance of winning (which is very sad that San Francisco is so bitterly partisan and senile).
Libertarianism is a conservative viewpoint, actually.
freakylocz14 1 year ago
"I didn't realize there were any Republicans that were allowed to be outside of the exact party lines." Oh dear god. Can you just suck my balls sac you partisan hack douchebag? Like every Demcorat is from the same mold? Please. What's refreshing is to come across a Democrat who believes the 2nd extends rights to the individual and who don't believe in thought policing the populace via "PC" speak. Die in fire fuckwad.
captwasabi 1 year ago
@allgoo19
I would HIGHLY recommend that you go to mises dot org and read up on some of the stuff there. Perhaps check out Hayek, Hazlitt, maybe some Rothbard...Anatomy of the State would probably be a good beginning. I have NO problem with you wanting to have socialized medicine or retirement pensions etc. I just don't want to be forced into them. Show tolerance to other people's ideas rather than trying to use the govt to force them to get what you want. That's pretty intolerant and corporate
JojahBoy 1 year ago
@allgoo19
"They buy their privileges that often violate "Individual Liberty" of others."
Yes they do. The best methodology they've figured out thus far is to use the State to help accomplish what they want via the regulatory system and other legal machinations of the State. Again, what YOU want is to concentrate power into the hands of a small group of people that are WAY more prone to corruption and can exact WAY more harm to the economy than any one corporation could EVER hope to achieve.
JojahBoy 1 year ago
@JojahBoy
"Individual Liberty is important is important bro.."
Ok, I'm getting what's wrong with the way you think.
Corporates are not individuals and they don't have "Individual Liberty".
They buy their privileges that often violate "Individual Liberty" of others.
If you still don't understand it, I'll try to explain it to you in other ways.
allgoo19 1 year ago
@JojahBoy
"And honestly, what you .."
Let me try to understand this.
You point is "I know a few regulation that were sponsored by the corporates for their advantage, so ALL the regulation have to be eliminated."
Is this correct?
allgoo19 1 year ago
@JojahBoy
"As for which country it's working in.."
So, your answer is "No country"? Is that right? You can't tell one country without regulation but you want US to try it, correct?
I can tell you many occasions very close to what you call "Actual Free Market" and all failed in disater.
Make your comment one a t a time, otherwise it'll become very confusing, unlessthat's your goal. I'm not reading the rest.
Keep it simple.
allgoo19 1 year ago
@allgoo19
Lastly, many want to concentrate power into the hands of a few people, basically promoting a monopoly (of the use of force in the State's case). Rather than allowing people their freedom to choose to be part of their economic ideologies they seem to want to use the violent nature of the state to force others to adhere to what they think is best. That's not very tolerant and is responsible for tens of millions dead in the last century. Individual Liberty is important is important bro.
JojahBoy 1 year ago