Why would someone rant and rave over ten HP? It didnt help the ram jet like greased lightning past the Tundra, and that was 9 hp difference. 390 v 381. I think the cobalt 2.2 holds it on stock, but the XRS performs well too.
and the yotahere in this stupid little clip.. is stock with a 2.4-liter engine good for 158 hp and 162 lb-ft of torque... As the Balt sits with the 2.2 L Ecotec rated at 148 hp and 155lb-ft of torque.. also the balt LS dont come with TCS,
And um, to hopcup1 ( what cobalt have eney one seen that will hit the 50mpg mark? none i know of,best i got out of mine wile it was stock was 42mpg and thats driveing on I10 to houstin at 104kph the hole way
@dav022001 When the NOS blows up your motor, then repost.
iToastieFTW 2 months ago
Corolla hands down. My ninety five corolla drove better than a twenty ten cobalt. Chevy just don't make cars like they used too.
doctorken2k 2 months ago
Turettooooooooooo!
vmaxx55 2 months ago
@juanox10 lmfaoooooo
streetracer8705 5 months ago
the chevys cant hang with a 2zz
MrBansheeguy 5 months ago
Why would someone rant and rave over ten HP? It didnt help the ram jet like greased lightning past the Tundra, and that was 9 hp difference. 390 v 381. I think the cobalt 2.2 holds it on stock, but the XRS performs well too.
135yota 5 months ago
@dav022001
Wrong car....this Corolla is 1.8L 2005-2006, 170hp only 130lb/ft....
ytj22 5 months ago
good race. At least it's not a mustang vs a corolla....and after the mustang wins, those fanboys would be proud of themselves.....
turbobenx 6 months ago
and the yotahere in this stupid little clip.. is stock with a 2.4-liter engine good for 158 hp and 162 lb-ft of torque... As the Balt sits with the 2.2 L Ecotec rated at 148 hp and 155lb-ft of torque.. also the balt LS dont come with TCS,
dav022001 6 months ago
And um, to hopcup1 ( what cobalt have eney one seen that will hit the 50mpg mark? none i know of,best i got out of mine wile it was stock was 42mpg and thats driveing on I10 to houstin at 104kph the hole way
dav022001 6 months ago