15 Questions Evolutionist's CAN'T answer! Question 3 - Mutations & Information
Uploader Comments (onceforgivennowfree)
Top Comments
-
@benfaust Childish Insults? Dude, I have read Creation.Com, I have watched "Does God Exist ?", I have seen all the repetitive Creationist material, and all you have done, is memorize all that. And THAT, has in the court of law be found to NOT BE SCIENCE. I meant spend 2 years on actual Evolutionary Biology. The peer reviewed kind. If you don;t wanna do that, tough shit, one more person chooses to go uneducated to the grave. You won't be the first. Its common. The damage is you spread this stuff.
Video Responses
All Comments (806)
-
Oh thats not true.Information can easily come via mutation.Ever wondered why you can see so many colours?Only 3 celltypes are needed.And guess what they are all only slightly different from each other so that the pigments inside have a slightly different form which explains different absorption spectrums.Seems pretty beneficial that this "mistake" happened right?Just to name one
-
I saw a Hollow Earther (a person who believes the earth is hollow and there are cities on the inside) quote a geologist saying "He said that an earthquake causes the earths plates to ring 'like a bell' well, a bell is hollow!"
What if he asked the geologist
"given that the earth rings like a bell, what justification do you have in saying it isn't hollow!" That is what is happening here.
The stars could be said to be "information" about the season, like a language, but only metaphorically.
-
That was a cute strawman you came up with at the end there. "If it only had a brain."
-
you are attepting to disprove evolution based on semantics?
-
@ONESPECIES I've already done that. You obviously just want to get in the last word, since you keep bothering to reply to things you can't or won't answer, providing only verbal abuse. That being the case, I'll let you have the last word. Hit me with your best shot of childish insults.
-
@benfaust Yeah, cause naturally, Its fully possible to go through the Entire Theory of Evolution, its evidence, and the arguments of the opposition, in this comment section, with 500 character exchanges. HAHAHA. Then you ask me why I call you mildly insane. An intelligent conversation goes like this. You go right now and spend about 1-2 years, educating yourself on what exactly Evolution is, and based on what evidence. And if you still disagree,but do know the subject,we will have a great time.
-
@ONESPECIES You keep replying to things I say by saying it's misinformation, then throwing in a few insults, instead of giving an intelligent rendering of how what I've said is supposedly false. You seem much better at insulting others than in carrying on a mature, intelligent, profitable conversation. It would help if you didn't treat others as though they are beneath you. After all, they're not. I hope you realize that.
-
@benfaust As I told you before, if that flamboyant display of misinformation is your best shot, you better quit talking about evolution, and go make somebody a sandwitch or pray some. You rediculous Creation.com Zombie.
-
@ONESPECIES If you say so. "Life comes from life" is a fact, not a "catch phrase." It doesn't matter if you don't like it. Penicillin fails on microorganisms which previously weren't resistant due to lateral gene transfer from other microorganisms which are already resistant. There is no creation of new genetic information -- it is already there. It's not "evolution," it's gene sharing, which is quite a different matter altogether.
Are you trying to be this bad, or is it indeed that bad? The "Libraries of Information" refers to the actual Libraries. They won't fit here, go read them. Also, what I explain here is the difference between how Scientists say Information and mean inheritable traits, while ID proponents say Information and mean Personal Intelligence Made It. Which is worlds apart. But hey, no need to be honest at all. BTW, sentences make sence between 2 periods. Chopping 4 second segments is not responding. Byes.
ONESPECIES 1 month ago
@ONESPECIES
Your rebuttal is to tell me to go read libraries? Are you serious?
And you are wrong about information (suprise!). Evo's and ID proponents BOTH understand that DNA codes for life. The debate is not over whether it contains information or not - any scientist who knows anything about biology KNOWS that DNA contains information. This is a serious scientific mistake on your part.
Maybe these 15 questions were too difficult for the Evo's? Your faith is now exposed!
onceforgivennowfree 1 month ago 4
@onceforgivennowfree A) what you call information is not what Scientists call information. Creationists call information what they suppose displays signs of Intelligence. Scientists call information what the dictionary says: The stuff you collect by observation! You clowns do not even fucking know what information means. And listen kid, You can;t ask any one if they are serious. You do not like the answer "libraries" but you find the useless "God Did it" great. What method can be based on that?
ONESPECIES 1 month ago 2
@ONESPECIES
Can you please provide a source for the claim that Creationists call information "that which displays signs of intelligence"? The 15 questions pamphlet did not state this. You are making a mistake between the definition of information, and it's cause. Yes, I believe that intelligence is the only adequate cause of information, but I don't define information as "that which displays signs of intelligence". I define it the same way as anyone else....a message, a code, etc
onceforgivennowfree 1 month ago