Atheists

I am an atheist.... Atheism is a lack of belief, not belief in evil or wanting religion stopped, Richard Dawkins assisted some of these points however I concluded some on my own, Dawkins is one of the most smartest people I have ever watched in debate. Atheists and agnostics feel free to answer the question

The question is more "to what end do we evolve" as i never considered that the universe may never end........ Religion answers this very...... simply.

So this is a clip i made for atheists

feel free to comment and answer

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Atheists
• Religion
• dawkins
• christianity
• war
• philosophy

[PriddyTP]

Depending where you stand you may see the sun rise every 24hours but from outer space you will see it orbiting every 90 minutes. So the Science behind METEOROLOGIST says 24 hours but the science behind Astronomy says 90 minutes , which science is correct ? Both Disciplines are a empty thought because man creates all science and definition to give everything meaning to understand which is fine. Everything was here way before man gave it meaning.

[Cagebreaker21]

@PriddyTP [2of4] Faith by definition is belief without evidence and if you want to live your life by it your welcome but do not expect a life that's consistently correct. What you said about contrasting meteorologists and astronomy isn't an argument, you will not see the earth make a rotation on its axis every 90minutes. Where you can see the sun is not determined by stansard 24hour time. The sun stays up for many hours over the 24 mark at the poles and science has an understanding of that.

[PriddyTP]

Concerning the science of AstroPhysics nobody has experienced a billion years, or even traveled a light year or for that matter moved at light speed let alone able to place your hands on "The Laws of Physics " . Please give the name of the person who has TOUCHED THE LAW OF PHYSICS ? except in his or her mind maybe through theory only. All of our predictions of how things should look or act are deduced from such explanations of how things are or suppose to be.

[Cagebreaker21]

@PriddyTP [3of4] What you say about touching the laws of physics is a mix up of language. Physics is a language, like english or french. If you accept the hypothesis that assigning language assists in communication and understanding it helps in gaining knowledge. You can't touch 'orange' but you can see orange under the conditional defenition it is assigned.

[PriddyTP]

Your thought's concerning INDUCTIVISM is correct but not new indeed. I will not let INDUCTIVISM off that lightly. Two serious misconceptions concerning INDUCTIVISM .First INDUCTIVISM proports to explain how science explains or obtains predictions about experiences . But most of our theoretical knowledge does not take that form. Scientific explanations are about reality most of which does not consist of anyones EXPERIENCES.

[Cagebreaker21]

@PriddyTP [4of4] You see, experience, feel physics. If you simply rely on touching things for reliability you won't get far. Inductivism can never and will never yeild 100% certainty, but if I can use statistics, we can see with a very very high probability that every time it will be reliable for mankind and we will get closer and closer to the 100% mark with it. Science and reasoning will be the most effective tools in reaching understanding.

[Cagebreaker21]

@PriddyTP [1of4]] What man cannot experience too interests me and most men. But what you are doing here is assuming there exists an unknown called god which is false under any rational frame. I can compare someones experience of god to someone getting knocked out and on waking say they saw a pink elepahant with wings, they may have experienced it, but that sort of thought will never give that person a stable life based on what is true.

[PriddyTP]

I am so amazed to wonder what I cannot see, touch, and hear that is still waiting to be discovered or seen or felt by me. Suggesting that just because I have not seen something means it does not exist is so ignorant . But whether you believe me or not is not my concern I don't believe in forced agreement rather shared worship, the believer and unbeliever is my friend, I don't have all the answers and I embrace people who ask all the questions. FAITH is my SCIENCE not the SCIENCE of MAN.

[Cagebreaker21]

@PriddyTP cont... now let me show you the evidence religion is fake. Science shows us life is distributed similar to a tree. Does it not make you wonder why there are branches of religions all of which contradict each other. It is by pure accident people are born into their religion and believe their type of god. That you need to explain.

[Cagebreaker21]

@PriddyTP You've got it! nail on the head. Before having EVIDENCE of Mars you were 100% right in believing it didn't exist (despite seeing something small in the sky). We dont have any evidence of god through science. If can also believe in goblins through that outlook. People saying they experienced god (as few as actually they are) are deluded, you notice they also lack decent forms of reasoning and can never ever produce any EVIDENCE for having experienced god other than saying it. cont...