Peggy Robertson's tells her story of insurance denial

Peggy Robertson was denied insurance coverage because she had a c-section. She was later told that if she was sterilized, she would be able to gain coverage.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• SEIU
• Peggy Robertson
• Colorado
• insurance company
• denial of insurance
• health insurance reform

[billeybop]

Why do you need the SEIU tag on the video? They are like the insurance company. They could care less about you. What matters to the people that run it is your membership=dues=power for the ones running it and not you. Do you really think that you are the real reason for there existance?

[SAGEBOT500]

LMAO! Look at these comments! Americans must be the only people on Earth whose response to getting buttfucked by corporate interests is to descend upon their capital and protest angrily for their right to continued buttfuckings.

[Anakin8th]

I'VE GOT BALLS OF STEEL

[jjt35]

Equating socialized medicine to subjugation is just wrong. I find your disposition extremely ironic. Jesus would advocate equalizing the distribution of wealth so that the poor can eat, sleep and be healthy. Sometimes this is called charity. Other times it is a forced redistribution of wealth via taxes. Either way, the poor in this country are aided as Jesus would have liked. So long as the money is put to good use, Jesus would (IMO) be happy. This is a terrible argument.

[2skullscrushing]

whats really funny to me is that this new health care bill was written by the same companies that ran regular insurance for years. you people are so dumb.this is the scam of all scams. and if you dont know what a ponzi scheme is, maybe you should look it up and learn something.

[TLCTugger]

I'd advise you have a VBAC water birth at home, but

Who the hell needs more than two kids? There are WAY too many of us. Get sterilized. I did.

Having more than one child already is the ONLY pre-existing condition I think all health plans should be entitled to use.

[BadilloKat]

I understand where you're coming from, really, I do. You feel smarter and better than everybody else "conforming" to regular, old, probably-will-be-changed ideas such as gravity, or relativity, even.

Considering that everything in your reality is up in the air, I bid you goodbye.

Do you seriously consider your way of thinking to be somehow revolutionary?

You're not shaking anyone's beliefs. You're preaching to the choir, even. But your way ouf thinking isn't going to solve anything.

[qstendious]

"Backed up by reality"? What reality? The ideas that you and some other people might believe at a given moment in time which could change altogether in a matter of minutes? That reality? Or are you referring to the supposed physical laws of this planet that consequently and very much ignored render everything to be impossible? Reality is not universal or constant. Why did you feel like you had to be childish and call me a dumbass? Is it because I'm threatening the foundation to your being?

[BadilloKat]

I answered why my belief is backed up by reality. I'm saying the "other" belief doesn't.

The fact that I attributed this "religion" ideology to you doesn't make me close-minded, it makes me prejudiced; dumbass. Learn, THEN use your words.

This abortion issue relies on the VERY definition of "life". I'm saying science and provable facts will eventually BE the definition, not some glorified idea. Law is secular, for the most part.

There is no life if there is no one up there. Remember Schiavo?

[qstendious]

My definition of life does not exist because I haven't one. I simply posed a hypothetical question which you chose to understand as a belief of mine. You have irrefutably demonstrated yourself to be a closed minded person looking only to argue and prove what you cannot rather than to "think", the very act of which you claim justifies and defines life. Now is this as deep as your thought process goes? Are you going to answer my question or dance around it some more? Who decides what life is? You?