Change Player Size
Watch this video in a new window

Peggy Robertson's tells her story of insurance denial

Peggy Robertson was denied insurance coverage because she had a c-section. She was later told that if she was sterilized, she would be able to gain coverage.  
 
Customize

More From: SEIU

Loading...

QuickList(0)

Featured Videos

Upgrade to Flash Player 10 for improved playback performance. Upgrade Now or get more info.
94 ratings
Sign in to rate
24,590 views
Want to add to Favorites? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to add to Playlists? Sign In or Sign Up now!
Want to flag a video? Sign In or Sign Up now!

Statistics & Data

Loading...

Video Responses (0)

This video has no Responses. Be the first to Post a Video Response.
Sign in to post a Comment

Text Comments (176)   Options

Loading...
jjt35 (1 week ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Equating socialized medicine to subjugation is just wrong. I find your disposition extremely ironic. Jesus would advocate equalizing the distribution of wealth so that the poor can eat, sleep and be healthy. Sometimes this is called charity. Other times it is a forced redistribution of wealth via taxes. Either way, the poor in this country are aided as Jesus would have liked. So long as the money is put to good use, Jesus would (IMO) be happy. This is a terrible argument.
2skullscrushing (2 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
whats really funny to me is that this new health care bill was written by the same companies that ran regular insurance for years. you people are so dumb.this is the scam of all scams. and if you dont know what a ponzi scheme is, maybe you should look it up and learn something.
TLCTugger (4 weeks ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I'd advise you have a VBAC water birth at home, but

Who the hell needs more than two kids? There are WAY too many of us. Get sterilized.  I did.

Having more than one child already is the ONLY pre-existing condition I think all health plans should be entitled to use.
qstendious (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Interesting that you have declared and protected yourself as "alive" by YOUR definition. What if my definition of "alive" and "thinking" differs from yours? What if I reduced you down to parts & pieces, flesh and bones? Would that grant me the right to take your life and be justified in doing so because my personal beliefs, realities, and concepts describe you as worthless? And if you are thinking I'm christian or etc... think again. I am 100% agnostic and believe anything is possible. Good day
BadilloKat (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Your definition of life is skewed by "everything is possible". It's great to think so, but when there is a physical manifestation of our PRESENCE in the brain, we're alive, until that manifestation disappears.
I'm not my liver, or my bones. If you separate every piece of someone, then you kill the brain, then you're killing the person.
Hey, here's a challenge for ya, find a definition of "alive" and "thinking" that DOESN'T include the person who's saying it. Hint: Dictionary.
qstendious (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
My definition of life does not exist because I haven't one. I simply posed a hypothetical question which you chose to understand as a belief of mine. You have irrefutably demonstrated yourself to be a closed minded person looking only to argue and prove what you cannot rather than to "think", the very act of which you claim justifies and defines life. Now is this as deep as your thought process goes? Are you going to answer my question or dance around it some more? Who decides what life is? You?
BadilloKat (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I answered why my belief is backed up by reality. I'm saying the "other" belief doesn't.
The fact that I attributed this "religion" ideology to you doesn't make me close-minded, it makes me prejudiced; dumbass. Learn, THEN use your words.
This abortion issue relies on the VERY definition of "life". I'm saying science and provable facts will eventually BE the definition, not some glorified idea. Law is secular, for the most part.
There is no life if there is no one up there. Remember Schiavo?
qstendious (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
"Backed up by reality"? What reality? The ideas that you and some other people might believe at a given moment in time which could change altogether in a matter of minutes? That reality? Or are you referring to the supposed physical laws of this planet that consequently and very much ignored render everything to be impossible? Reality is not universal or constant. Why did you feel like you had to be childish and call me a dumbass? Is it because I'm threatening the foundation to your being?
BadilloKat (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
I understand where you're coming from, really, I do. You feel smarter and better than everybody else "conforming" to regular, old, probably-will-be-changed ideas such as gravity, or relativity, even.
Considering that everything in your reality is up in the air, I bid you goodbye.
Do you seriously consider your way of thinking to be somehow revolutionary?
You're not shaking anyone's beliefs. You're preaching to the choir, even. But your way ouf thinking isn't going to solve anything.
qstendious (1 month ago) Show Hide
 0
Marked as spam
Sounds like someone is getting roughed up in one of the nearby rooms.

Would you like to comment?

Join YouTube for a free account, or sign in if you are already a member.