2008 Creation Evidence Expo, Part 2 of 3

Part two contains a lecture on pre-flood and post-flood giants. Dr. Willie Dye was a featured guest speaker at the 2008 Creation Evidence Expo held in Indianapolis, Indiana and also visits the Trinity Broadcasting Network and WXNT 1480 AM. Part two of three.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• creation
• evidence
• expo
• giants
• Dr. Willie Dye
• Noah's Ark
• archaeology
• pre-flood
• Genesis
• Christian
• evolution
• Darwin
• biology
• atheist

[dlhitch2007]

"I do not attempt to demean you by saying this..."

Don't worry about that Stu, you can say what ever is on your mind. I have respect for your passion. I have no doubt you believe strongly in what you are saying.

"...those who hold a contrary point of view consistently disregard this evidence."

When you show me skeletons of giants that stand up to scientific scrutiny I will believe you.

[stubabyq]

The funny thing is Hitch; they interpreted many of the large bones found by secular archaeologists as animal bones just because of their size. However, upon closer scientific scrutiny by forensic scientists the determination became that the bones were human. You will want this book as soon as it is available.

[dlhitch2007]

Dye is a RAVING LOON. No scientist would ever make such bizarre claims about early humanity without truckloads of evidence. If he's writing a book on giants, let's see the evidence.

[stubabyq]

Correction. No EMPIRICAL scientist would ever make, blah, blah. As for the book, we are putting it together now with plenty evidence. However, if your mind is already made up to reject truth, you will not find it of benefit. One could not be a successful scientist without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid. - James Watson

[dlhitch2007]

"However, if your mind is already made up to reject truth, you will not find it of benefit."

I am happy to look at any evidence you have, but the claims you are making are quite extraordinary. I surprised you are the only researcher who has turned up such evidence. I would think any anthropologist or palaeontologist who discovered such evidence would report it. If you can show me giant human skeletons that survive scientific scrutiny , I will be impressed.

[stubabyq]

I do not attempt to demean you by saying this, but those who hold a contrary point of view consistently disregard this evidence. Because their livelihood depends upon the spread of empirical science and Darwinism, the political ramifications of these kinds of discoveries lead to rejection of empirical evidence not discovered by empirical scientists. It means that what is being learned from and taught in textbooks is incorrect.

[lizazoon]

And god said Nothing, zilch , NADA.

[fastfashn]

36 feet tall, hmm? Right... AND where are the bones now?

All this stuff you are saying, and what do I find? Second and third hand stories. He said a giant was found. In Carthage a giant was found. Blah blah blah. She said. He said.

People have been saying for 2000 years that the Rapture is next week. Chirp. Chirp.  Chirp.

[fastfashn]

Those were not ancient giants, they were giants who died in the fight with He Who Must not be Named. Gods man, haven't you read Harry Potter?

[dlhitch2007]

"Microevolution can occur within a kind but not across kinds as in different breeds of dogs but they are still dogs."

If somehow all humans and dogs disappeared besides a single colony of great danes and a single colony of Shih Tzus they would be two different species of dogs. I don't think the Shih Tzus could breed with the Great Danes without human help.