Electric OU 7: Up is OFF

OK, I realize this is quite a bit harder than rocket science, but come on, hook up a light bulb and see what happens.

(NOTE: the bulb has an inductance of 110 MICRO henries, not milliHenries as I mistakenly said in the video.)

Or am I going to be accused of fakery or mistakery here too?

Fine, point out the mistake and show a reasoned argument and some experimental support.

A 250,000 RD oscilloscope is worthless if you don't understand what it's telling you. Sometimes a simple light bulb makes a better instrument.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• oscilloscope
• Ainslie
• error
• overunity
• duty
• cycle
• mosfet
• lecroy
• ufo
• jesus
• soapsuds

[TinselKoala]

It's gravity which pulls us down, and destiny which breaks us apart.

v=enhmhbNq76M

[Drevtoobe]

Aaron:

"According to your understanding, does the coil current in your opinion always have a certain proportionate amount of voltage attached to it? If so, can that ever change or is the voltage/current relationship in a coil, that creates a certain magnetic field strength always locked together - either in a straight or inverse relationship? What do you think?"

Are we in inverse-MIB mode? Or have we never left Kansas, and it simply does not ever sink in?

Aaron: No relationship at all.

[TinselKoala]

Yeh, I thought that was hilarious too. Can you imagine trying to explain complex numbers and reactive power and phase lag... to a rosebush?

[TinselKoala]

And I see Joit is trying still to save his position, by accusing me of changing components or other errors.

That's BS, Joit, and you can prove it to yourself by simply hooking a light bulb to YOUR circuit and testing it at low frequencies.

The circuit shown here is , except for the temporary bulb substitution as the load, the circuit that Ainslie published in the Quantum article and the EIT paper--which cites the Quantum article as its only reference.

I even used the right MOSFET.

[TinselKoala]

The POINT is that a profound lack of understanding of basic circuit behavior MAY have caused Rosemary Ainslie to use the WRONG figures for the duty cycle in her experiment, and IF this WRONG duty cycle was used in the energy balance calculations, they are invalid.

I'm NOT saying that her effect is impossible--yet. I'm saying that the Ainslie "research" is so full of holes and errors that it can't be trusted to be accurate.

What you see here, along with her posts, illustrates that point.

[TinselKoala]

Rosemary says:

"TK is now going public with the complaint that no MOSFET can actually turn off."

This is NOT TRUE!!!

Where in any of my videos do I say or even imply that?

Rosemary, you should be very careful about what you are saying about me.

At least try to think about what I'm showing before you "assume" that I am saying or implying something that I am not.

[aber0der]

Gravity, gravity, GRAVITY!!!!!!

[Drevtoobe]

"Just as every cop is a criminal

And all the sinners saints

As heads is tails

Just call me lucifer

'Cause I'm in need of some restraint"

LOL, the psychodrama continues. I think that I know who the cops are and who the sinners are.

Paint it black, you devil! LOL

[TinselKoala]

Rosemary said:

"This link has been provided by a friend from (you know where, -TK) It's been posted by TK and apparently shows that a MOSFET is constitutionally unable to apply any effective duty cycle to a battery supply source."

That, of course, is NOT what this video shows. A mosfet can supply whatever duty cycle you tell it to. How else could they be used as audio amps, for instance?

This vid shows the relationship of gate signal, mosfet state, and load current.

[nexustron]

LOL, I´ve followed this debacle from the beginning through oucom and energeticforum. I don´t know where you find the strength to convince the deluded.

Love how you try to make it as simple as possible "OFF is ON" repeated, even if I was semi conscious I would get it.

The trouble is that In matters of blind faith logic is not a welcome guest to the party, it spoils their buzz so to speak.

Don´t worry, anyone with a modincum of objectivity will already agree that you are correct.