Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

The LongBow part 3 of 12

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
50,066
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 21, 2007

The Long Bow

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • The one thing i hate about these shows, is that they do "tests" and discover that a longbow arrow would not piece armour. Ok, thats fine. by the 14C that was true.

    But they fail to consider the psychological impact of being rained on by 90 000 arrows. also, the knights were safe, but what about the HORSES? they dont mention the chaos that would occure when several thousand horses were injured, and freaked out, throwing their rider etc.

    A horse with 10 arrows in it is not going to behave!!

  • I wonder what would have happened if they had a bodkin head on the arrow

see all

All Comments (88)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • He is also forgetting that the archers would have been using armor piercing broad heads

  • @drahcirdier Hot damn nice comeback against that idiot :D

  • They're forgetting that the knights themselves have a velocity relative to the archers. Supposing a knight moves at 10 m/s towards the archer and the arrow travels at 30 m/s away from the archer at impact, the resulting 40 m/s relative speed results in about 78% more kinetic energy compared to an arrow flying at 30 m/s towards a target. This would go a long way towards penetrating the armour.

  • @lifes40123 During this period in history. At the battle of Crecy, in 1346 (the one in the video), horses would have been UNARMOURED.

    At the battle Bosworth, in 1485 horses WOULD have been armoured. (slightly)

  • @drahcirdier what period... some horses didnt and some horses did u douchbag

  • @lifes40123 Wow... that was intelligent...

    Horses were unarmoured during this period.

  • @drahcirdier horses had armor on them too u fuck

  • @Tareltonlives It was a bodkin they used.

  • @yourredcomrade717

    Depends on what period you're talking about, as well as what type of soldier. You wouldn't have found a Man-at-Arms without plate by the 15th century.

  • @drahcirdier not to mention chainmaile was the most common armor. plate armor was expensive. and very rare. making this test sort of a moot point.

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more