Cosmic perversity!

Will atheists please be consistent?

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• universe
• cosmos
• atheism
• science
• religion
• philosophy
• discussion
• video log
• vlog
• atheist
• bible
• debate
• ufo
• space
• earth

[ShadowWalker1971]

Good points. You obviously don't anyway, but don't sweat insults from people such as philylennon, because you probably sparked an attempt at deep thought in them, and then when it didn't happen for them and they started drooling with smoke coming out of their ears, they just got mad and lashed out at you out of their frustration at their failure of trying to wrap their tiny so called mind around what you said in the video. They don't understand your logic, therefore your logic to them is "dumb".

[atticana]

@ShadowWalker1971 Thanks for watching the video and for your supportive comment. And thanks also for the sub!

[philylennon]

You are so insanely dumb. You miss understand logic!

[atticana]

@philylennon I'm sorry that I've annoyed you so much. But even so, thank you for watching the video and commenting. And PS...remember what I said before, there is no need to get angry with me, I am not THE ENEMY, just a guy who thinks differently to you.

[MuchRejoycing]

We don't know as scientist , new ideas arise and observations that support or refute them is an on going process. I think it's the greatest show on Earth just now . The necessity of the magical guy is disappearing ,fast I might add ,,and more on a human level becoming a lot more distant .Gods ain't what they used to be

I wait for the day when the last thing an honest theist can say

"God in his omniscience has created a universe that seems not to require his existence " ,,,,I'm impressed

[UppruniTegundanna]

You're right, there's nothing in contemporary cosmology that precludes God, and I would go further and say that nor will there ever be a cosmological model that precludes God. Science is incapable of making statements about the existence or non-existence of supernatural entities. For me, there are things that we know and things we don't know, and that's it. I can't begin postulating the existence of entities that reside beyond our actual knowledge.

All video responses are welcome on my channel.

[unassumption]

We need to figure out how the universe came into being, what happened in the first seconds of the big bang, first then we can find out why it happened... not just as a species but as individuals, lots of us speculate on the more interesting questions (who set this up? was there someone?) without looking at what the thing that's possibly been created is

[unassumption]

This seems like it should be directed to cosmologists more than athiests; many of us don't have enough evidence to really come to conclusions on this kind of thing.

The way I see it, something has to be logically nesicary. If it's the choice between some clean, general mathmatical laws that result in a universe, or a personal being who crafts laws that result in a universe, the former seem more likely the kind of thing that could be simple... but that's just my inner philosopher speculating

[unassumption]

Weather these two things are really analogus is debatable but it's interesting; were you using similarity tospontaneous generation as a tool in your argument or was it just a rhetorical device?

Never objected to Aquinas the universe must have a beginning because an infinite time cannot be spanned stuff - like the ancient argument for atoms, plus it's supported by science, the universe seems to have had a beginning. Weather that implies a 'beginner' is the real debate.

[philylennon]

@atticana Can I ask, where that gets you though? Does it get you any closer to anything at all!? I could easily say that Quantum mechanics is the result of all knowing Jam sandwich and not be any less right than you! You have no reason to just assume a god especially of a certain religion. That doesnt get us anywhere and it never will so stop arguing points when you blatantly have no idea what your talking about.

[alexkidd3d]

I find it supremely arrogant to assume you know the ultimate cause of the universe. Scientists freely explain that they cannot yet know. We have reasonable hypothesis based on what we know but this idea that there is some secular dogma prescribing a creation story is silly. Generally it is the atheist who is consistent in regards eternity, he doesn't say the universe must of existed forever but points out that if you believe god can ...why can't the universe?

[schmatt13]

Don't give me this God can be understood in various ways, I beg consistancy from theists. Quantum Mechanics shows that intelligent artifice is redundant. Quit moving the goal posts.