Why Do You Think They Fireproof Steel Trusses?

9/11 fires & steel in the buildings: Steel trusses CAN fail in fires (that's why they try to protect them from fires.
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2007/06/campaign-to-stop-lies-and-den...

If you think steel can't be affected by fire, why do you think they spray fireproofing onto steel trusses in the first place?

It is depraved to deny the main motive for the 9/11 attacks.

SCANDAL: "9/11 Commissioners Bowed to Pressure to Suppress Main Motive for the 9/11 Attacks"
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/09/reviews-of-without-precedent-...

WTC 7 was severely damaged on the south side of the building and was on fire for about 7 hours.
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/09/wtc-7-was-severely-damaged-on...

WTC Pre-Collapse Bowing Debunks 9/11 "Controlled Demolition" Theory
http://www.representativepress.org/BowingDebunksExplosives.html
NIST FAQ:
http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm

http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2007/05/us-backed-israeli-abuse-of-pa...
US Backed Israeli Abuse of Palestinians Motivated Bin Laden
"Very early in his career and very consistently, bin Laden has been outspoken in support of the Palestinians and of course condemning the Israelis, so it's an issue that clearly weighs heavily on his mind and is motivating." Michael Scheuer former CIA Bin Laden Unit Chief interviewed by Scott Horton on Antiwar Radio

Osama bin Laden Has Been Angry About U.S. Support of Israel for Decades
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/08/osama-bin-laden-has-been-angr...

The New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman has spread the lie that "bin Laden never focused on this issue. He only started talking about "Palestine" after September 11." This canard has been spread by the mainstream media.
http://representativepress.blogspot.com/2006/12/thomas-friedman-is-truly-one-...

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• steel
• trusses
• fire
• fireproof
• fireproofing
• 9/11
• conspiracy
• hijackers
• Commission
• terrorism
• 911
• September
• WTC
• WTC7

[twetty291]

@armymatt83 What you said is correct but I still don't understand.Yes any building will fall if you use a big enough bomb,that's obvious.Okla building had no,none what so ever of anykind of bomb proof.WTC7 the basement was reinforced,the first 5 stories had reinforced steel that had a total of four coatings of fireproof foam and 1 coat of a foamsealer.Even the windows had all been replaced on the first 5 stories.They were made to withstand temperatures in excess of 2000degs for 18 hours.

[armymatt83]

@twetty291 theres no such thing as a bomb proof building if the bomb is big enough

[twetty291]

I seen on TV they talking about the only steel and cement building to fall IN HISTORY of just a small smoldering fires in different areas was WTC7.If WTC7 fell because of fire it should have not been a complete failure.Okla,Tim McVeigh,used a much more powerful bomb from 40 feet from the building and look what it done.Half of the building still stood and it was not bomb proof like WTC7 was suppose to beat least blast proof.

[LightningBoltz]

@5147848amp I' feel exactly the same way. I have lost motivation to keep this up. I mean, there are far too many things that can or have been proven that are sufficient reason to end this system and government. No reason expelling too much time and effort on just one thing. We know this system is fail and that our gov't is backwards and corrupt. Now, we just need the masses to see it our way. For that to happen, the criminals just have to keep doing what they're already doing. And they will!

[5147848amp]

@LightningBoltz

We're both stuck in the same part of the quagmire. I think I'm going to give 9/11 a rest for now. I am not getting anywhere with the key questions, and I'm no longer confident that I CAN prove anything to myself. Furthermore, it's gotten to the point where rifts are brewing within my family! Amazing how far the ripples reach, isn't it? I'm with you, though, on this: The whole thing definitely reeks. Why let the weird into your life, eh?! Let the weirdos play their little game.

[LightningBoltz]

@5147848amp I feel ya, man. The whole thing reeks. I just don't have enough information to understand what actually happened that day. I must prove it to myself. It doesn't help much when half of the "truth movement" is just as willing to distort facts as the gov't is to prove their point. There is disinformation coming from both sides trying to prove their point. I read the 9/11 commission report and it is garbage. But there is a lot of garbage on the other side of the argument as well.

[5147848amp]

@LightningBoltz

That's what confuses me about the plane strikes. How can the collapse of two of the buildings be caused by planes, if a third unstruck building also collapsed? And why is there never a public, televised debate airing this stuff so that the citizenry can get somewhere on these questions.

[LightningBoltz]

WTC 7 was not hit by a plane so any information relating to planes hitting buildings would be irrelevant.

[5147848amp]

@LightningBoltz

Seen. Have you come across any other plane-struck buildings, and/or information on the probable consequences of a plane strike?