Battle of Stamford Bridge (Ch. 4: 1066) Part 1/3
Loading...
38,576
Loading...
Uploader Comments (mpc12345678)
Top Comments
-
This is how they should teach 1066 in schools, by showing kid this. The subject used to bore me until I watched it.
see all
All Comments (79)
-
@apocca idiot
-
It is too bad that King Harald's army had to travel so far, fight/win a battle, then race back south to fight William. William got lucky, for he barely won England. To hell with the Normans!! England forever!!
-
@apocca There anglo saxons
-
要用東西勾敵人進陣中砍殺 需要有那種力量,趁他站不穩 要勾掉敵人東西也需要技巧力量 絆倒也不錯
-
實戰應該是會用武器跟盾把對手的盾撥開 砍脖子,頭,手腳,砍沒盔甲保護的部分,砍不破盔甲的
-
這電影的內容好像電動 可能書上寫的比較真實
-
砍擊除了砍中要害'包刮血管.內臟.腦部.頸動脈.心肺 他那高劈如果沒砍中要害,也砍不死人 對方的人停不下來 砍斷脖子是可行的方式 砍到臉頰或是脖子沒砍斷是會受傷而已不至於昏倒 電影拍攝人員都是用幻想去拍攝電影 電影都是幻想的 紀錄片有包含部分真實內容
-
砍到鎖子甲彈掉應該是不行 砍不死
Loading...
This is some ridiculous english propaganda. Vikings as little kids that pee their pants? Danish history books say something completely different. This documentary also seems to have left out how a single man held the bridge against 40 english soldiers all by himself.
apocca 1 year ago
@apocca PS: The vikings did not piss their pants, it was the English :)
mpc12345678 1 year ago 24
@apocca Actually it does not. You should see the full documentary before saying its wrong :) The battle of stamford part 2 shows u the single man that held the bridge.
mpc12345678 1 year ago 9
Is the spearman simon pegg?
moviemaker2215 2 years ago
I dunno, how many min in did u see him?
mpc12345678 2 years ago