@DeckDudes No problem, actually it can be done without a break until you have to deal your card, so it's virtually "Breakless"of course until your deal. Thanks for the info
@gunperry The Zuccaro technique does use a break in combination with a side jog. Just my opinion on the centre deal you should work to learn, although tegibs opinion is probably of more value than mine on this issue, the kennedy deal in my opinion is the only one that is practical for the table, it is harder, however it is the only one i've come across that doesn't require a get-ready. thanks for the genii info by the way.
@Tegib1 No problem. Yes, it is similar to that but the Zuccaro tecnique is breakless, it's a center deal without a break. I'm starting right now learning the center deal, what do you think should I learn first? The Kennedy or the Nash one? Yes, I can do Bottoms and Seconds
@gunperry Oh okay sorry for making a wrong assumption. I haven't seen this before but I did some google search and on Genii forum that say that it is some sort of a center deal from a step. While in this demonstration I used a step to get control of the cards in the center, this center deal does not require a step it can be dealt straight from the break. It is acutally a variation of Kennedy's center.
@Tegib1 Thanks a lot man, i'll probably check it out anyway, as although I have the description from revelation, I can't do the kennedy technique at all, and sometimes a different perspective helps.
@gunperry The version that is published in Genii is Allen Kennedy center deal and I can tell you that my center is different from Kennedy center deal.
@gunperry oh, ok thanks.
DeckDudes 2 months ago
@DeckDudes No problem, actually it can be done without a break until you have to deal your card, so it's virtually "Breakless"of course until your deal. Thanks for the info
gunperry 2 months ago
@gunperry The Zuccaro technique does use a break in combination with a side jog. Just my opinion on the centre deal you should work to learn, although tegibs opinion is probably of more value than mine on this issue, the kennedy deal in my opinion is the only one that is practical for the table, it is harder, however it is the only one i've come across that doesn't require a get-ready. thanks for the genii info by the way.
DeckDudes 2 months ago
Flawless. I'm somewhat envious really. Great job.
ChapmaniacPictures 2 months ago
@Tegib1 No problem. Yes, it is similar to that but the Zuccaro tecnique is breakless, it's a center deal without a break. I'm starting right now learning the center deal, what do you think should I learn first? The Kennedy or the Nash one? Yes, I can do Bottoms and Seconds
gunperry 2 months ago
@gunperry Oh okay sorry for making a wrong assumption. I haven't seen this before but I did some google search and on Genii forum that say that it is some sort of a center deal from a step. While in this demonstration I used a step to get control of the cards in the center, this center deal does not require a step it can be dealt straight from the break. It is acutally a variation of Kennedy's center.
Tegib1 2 months ago
@Tegib1 No, I'm referring to Genii Vol.31 No.2 Page 91 of 1966. The Fabulous Center Deal by Dom Paolino
gunperry 2 months ago
@Tegib1 Thanks a lot man, i'll probably check it out anyway, as although I have the description from revelation, I can't do the kennedy technique at all, and sometimes a different perspective helps.
DeckDudes 2 months ago
@DeckDudes It's the december 2001 issue of Genii that he is referring to but that is the Allen Kennedy center deal
Tegib1 2 months ago
@gunperry The version that is published in Genii is Allen Kennedy center deal and I can tell you that my center is different from Kennedy center deal.
Tegib1 2 months ago