The Origin of Life

"The particular truth is simply that we have no reliable evidence as to the evolutionary sequence...One can find qualified, professional arguments for any group being the descendant of almost any other." *J. Bonner, "Book Review", American Scientist 49:1961, p. 240

"The very sucess of the Darwinian model at a micro-evolutionary [sub-species] level...only serves to highlight its failure at a macroevolutionary [across species] level." *Michael Denton, Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1985), p. 344

"The facts fail to give any information regarding the origin of actual species, not to mention the higher categories." *Richard Goldschmidth, The Natural Basis of Evolution, p. 165.
Mathematics, Probabilities and DNA
http://www.warneveryone.com/mathematics_probabilities_dna.htm
Spontaneous Generation
http://www.warneveryone.com/spontaneous_generation.htm
DNA and RNA
http://www.warneveryone.com/dna_rna.htm

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone

KJV1611 Bible - http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=authorizedversion&search=Search

Duane Gish Ph.D. Biochemistry, University of California, Berkley. Dr. Gish is the Vice President of the Institute for Creation Research, and frequently travels abroad to give seminars and lectures on creation science. He is arguably the foremost debater of creation science in the world, and many of his debate transcripts can be found below. He spent a total of 18 years in biochemical research; with Cornell University Medical College (NYC), with the Virus Laboratory, U of Cal-Berkley and and on the research staff of the Upjohn Pharmaceutical Company (Michigan). Dr. Gish has also published approximately 40 articles in scientific journals. Northwest Creation Network
23208 55th Ave W.
Mountlake Terrace, WA 98043
206-465-1635
contact@nwcreation.net

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• crxxxev
• Wilder-Smith
• DNA
• COSMOS
• NAUTILOID
• GENE
• creation
• evolution
• Dinosaur
• whales
• stars
• moon
• earth
• comets

[lawilson200]

BereanBeacon-No matter how many copyright violations you make by posting ICR junk, you still have made a dent to the fact evolutionary science is well established and will not be overthrown by the likes of you or your compatriots.

[BereanBeacon]

Commissar lawilson200, The only thing you people have is a somewhat efficient propaganda machine operating in all areas of education similar in countries dominated by Marxism. Your desire is to keep people in the dark and prisoner to both your religions. Wise men lay up knowledge: but the mouth of the foolish is near destruction. Proverbs 10:14

[TheScienceFoundation]

@TruthSeekingOne 'some slight variation within a species which will not change it into another species of animal over any period of time'

pubmed.gov search for : speciation.

[TruthSeekingOne]

@AntiTheocracy I do seek truth, show me some empirical evidence that supports the theory of evolution instead of some slight variation within a species which will not change it into another species of animal over any period of time - and then I will give some credence to the idea in that area, but even still there is much more you fail to see which needs to be overcome before the evolution theory is at all practical.

[AntiTheocracy]

@TruthSeekingOne and your name is pretty ironic, as you don't seem interested in the search for truth at all, rather than reinforcing the falsehoods you've already been indoctrinated with.

[TruthSeekingOne]

@AntiTheocracy Evolution and Big Bang theories are almost hand in hand, they are both the only two popular theories (which usually go together) that pseudo scientists have to try and solve our questions of origin without having a creator involved. Even with the high improbability of BOTH of these theories, one could still argue that a God used these methods to orchestrate the sequence of events that caused our existence. Your name AntiTheocracy is very telling of your ignorance to the issue..

[AntiTheocracy]

@TruthSeekingOne I'm talking about the one the scientific community uses, and not the creationist propaganda strawman version.

Sorry if it wasn't clear. I do realize that creationists use "evolution" to describe every aspect of a naturalistic worldview that they don't agree with.

[TruthSeekingOne]

@AntiTheocracy That depends on what classification of evolution you are talking about.

[AntiTheocracy]

Somebody should have told this guy evolution isn't the theory about the origin of life before he went on a 45 minute tangent.

[Diosibundo]

Wow.

This is really stupid.

So the only possible explanation for the Origin of Life is "It must have been One of US... but with superpowers..."

Brilliant.

[seekfears]

google Doe's Account

[TheScienceFoundation]

lol quoting an article from 1961

I notice a lot of down thumbing here, but not a lot of refutations of what us 'evilutionists' are saying.