9/11 Truth Debate - Ground Zero - 9/11/2010

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
7,938
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 11, 2010

Uncut, Unedited debate at ground zero today - 9/11/2010, between Glenn Zarmanov of WeAreChange New Jersey, and a man on the street. Do your own research on the topics presented and come to your own conclusions.

  • likes, 6 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (911Infowarrior)

  • Dragaster and Funny car bodies are made of Fiberglass not steel.

  • @timrocket2008 NO THATS A CONSPIRACY THEORY YOU KOOKY MOONBAT WINGNUT TWOOFER!!!

    Oh wait, no it's not....

Top Comments

  • He is obviously an agent

see all

All Comments (283)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Somebody needs to slap the shit out of that lady. Damn. Let the dude that actually has done the research talk. 9/11 truth

  • This is where the debates stop:

    watch?v=aPEpcjsJKCI

    watch and make it viral

  • This video shows that 911 Truth consists of a handful of kooks arguing on the sidewalk. They can't attract anyone to their rallies. Hits on truther web sites have plummeted. This "movement" has had no impact on anything. The quack demolition theories have sunk like a stone in the scientific world.

    Hey kooks, maybe you should join up with your soulmates in the moon landing denial and holocaust denial camps. Maybe then you'll get a decent turn-out at your shitty little rallies.

  • @WallStwizkid

    1/4 of them aren't actually what they claim they are.

  • @WallStwizkid

    True!

  • @TruthersRAlwaysWrong In fact, 43 airplanes could have, according to him, which would still be 100 tons below capacity. lol....does anybody else think this is bizarre? If you look at the "engineers for truth" and compare them to the population of engineers just in this country alone, they're like 1/4 of 1% of engineers. It's laughable. I actually work in that area and I was thinking of getting a petition passed around to ban them from the area on anniversaries. We're completely sick of them.

  • @TruthersRAlwaysWrong Yeah not only that, but they're watching edited videos of interviews, that were of course edited by conspiracy sites. The guy who made those comments, he wasn't factoring in the fuel load, and wasn't factoring burning jet fuel, and wasn't referring to the the ability of the structure to hold when the beams above were not square with the beams below. It's laughable that this guy thinks 40 commercial airliners could fly into the towers at 450mph with fully loaded fuel.

  • By the way, 300 tons by 40 is 12,000 not 13k. Go back to second grade.

  • Yeah now factor the dynamic load with the static load, and the asymmetrical shift of force due to a big gaping hole in the tower. Bunch of crackpots, there's close up footage of the collapse, you can see the damn building fail. Do you know how loud demolitions are? You can hear them miles away. There were definitely no explosives. If you can watch live footage of an event, as well as listen to witnesses that were on the scene, and still have these conspiracy theories, you're a nut.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more