Rudolf Nureyev Pierrot Lunaire

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
12,117
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Sep 28, 2009

Rudolf Nureyev Pierrot Lunaire Рудольф Нуреев Лунный Пьеро 77 y.

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Genrietta)

  • I`v only this...

see all

All Comments (15)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Isawthemwhen I would like to have seen his earlier interpretation of this role, and not the later, more superficial (i.e. over-acted!) version. Alas by the time he was touring in all those 'Nureyev and Friends' things he was much older, and no longer dancing well. He was very ill, and his body, feet and ankles were worn and damaged. His blazing spirit, however, never dimmed until the very end. I suspect that dancing on and on kept him alive.

  • @pediatrapaola Like or dislike this piece - Rudolf Nureyev was not Christopher North! They were totally different dancers. Nureyev had to find HIS way of inhabiting the role, rather than merely attempting copy its originator.

    Remember that Rudi chose to tackle such unusual roles. He loved working with contemporary choreographers. He loved to try new steps, new ideas, new approaches to dance. After all, he was no longer young, and he had already triumphed in all the great classical roles.

  • I love and respect Nureyev. I don't like this piece, nor its ear-splittingly unpleasant score. My personal opinion, only - others may find both delightful. When Nureyev first tackled this role he did it very differently - and far more effectively, I have read - than in later versions. The clip in I AM A DANCER drew sad cricitism from friends and dance professionals for his gaping-mouthed, whimsical, overly childlike facial expressions. Even so he was eager to experiment and take risks.

  • Thanks for posting this, I really enjoyed his performance on stage, I certainly don't think Tetley or he made a mistake or that it was "awful." He was trying to experiment with other forms of dance, you have to give him credit for having the courage and also he revealed a deep vulnerability in this role. The only thing disconcerning was the shaking tower and isolation, but it was absolutely fascinating and stands as an example of his ambidexterity and versatility .

  • @Isawthemwhen may be dear but saw ballet for all my life and nureyev many many times,and pierrot lunaire directly with the dancer who created the role,so.......

  • you could save your time not reading it for ex .if you don't know who is cristopher bruce go on google.and please save also your time not writing again .regards.

  • @pediatrapaola The real "PITY" and waste of time was reading your adolescent droning of a post all in capitals and bad spelling. грубо коровы

  • SAW MANY TIMES THIS PIECE IN LONDON DUE RAMBERT BALLET,ALWAYS FAUND IT AWFUL.NUREYEV IS FAR WORST THAN CHRISTOPHER BRUCE IN IT ,SO DOUBLE AWFUL.LOVED RUDY SO MUCH ,WHAT'S A PITY LOST TIME WITH THIS JUNCK.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more