Just how big is the threat of echinococcus granulosus?

This is just one example of how echinococcus granulosus can be spread to unsuspecting individuals. We need the full support of state and federal agencies to promptly complete studies of its distribution in our environment. In 2009 62% of Idaho wolves tested and 65% of Montana wolves tested were positive for carrying echinococcus granulosus

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• echinococcus
• granulosus
• +wolveas+Western
• Predator
• Control
• Association

[345kobi]

@Rockholm66 The big risk to Idaho wildlife is habitat mismanagement. Years ago the logging industry lobbied a law through the legislature that required fires to be put out within one day of when it started. Many of those smaller fires should have been let burn. That is just one of the habitat issues we are facing.

[345kobi]

@Rockholm66 1. Neimeyer wrote the book Wolfer. Mech did admit to being responsible for the misunderstanding of alpha and beta roles in wolf packs. I respect that. I haven't seen anything put out by the Dutchers that would lead me to believe that it was fabricated. They definitely have the good background on the study of wolves.

Not sure why you would say "This agenda was developed to destroy wildlife". I just can't fathom why they would do that.

[Rockholm66]

@345kobi With that list of mentors, you are seriously being fed nothing but lies. Neimeyer is no author, Mech had to admit his theories and study of wolves was flawed, Dutchers have fabricated just about everything.

The reality of this failed experiment is, the wolf was never endangered in any way. This agenda was developed to destroy wildlife, and it worked all too well for them. Wolf introduction is a criminal enterprise, based on scientific fraud.

[345kobi]

@Rockholm66 I found that I couldn't learn much by blogging. Many on both sides of the issue tweak the information to their liking. In addition, while some are very truthful, some just flat out lie. I feel I get the best information through face to face conversations with people who have spent years studying wolves. Also some authors such as Neimeyer, Meech, Murie and Dutcher seem to publish information no matter which side it favors.

[Rockholm66]

@345kobi Seriously? Are you seriously going to copy/paste? Keep studying, because if you truly sought the truth, you will eventually get there.

[345kobi]

@Rockholm66 (continued from previous message) accelerate an ongoing process and need not be viewed as compromising the "natural" or "historic" taxonomic arrangement of wolves in the area." - From "Wolves for Yellowstone vol IV". "Wolves for Yellowstone" is a four volume study that was done to determine if and how wolves should be introduced. The study also suggests the the number of subspecies needs to be reduced to about 5 - based on using genetics and larger sample sizes.

[345kobi]

@Rockholm66" Wolves were essentially eradicated in the Rocky Mountains south of central Canada by the 1930's and thus any characteristics peculiar to the populations in that area of the continent were lost. Since then, wolves most likely from Alberta and BC began appearing in the northwestern U.S. and within the past decade established a breeding population. Therefore, obtaining wolves from BC or Alberta for reintroduction into Yellowstone and/or central Idaho would only (continued)

[brandy19588]

@illadvised000 2 wolves were killed this weekend in YOUR honor!!!....Keep running your mouth, It brought us good, No...GREAT luck!!....Thank You!!

[Rockholm66]

@345kobi If every biologist told you this, then we sure have an awful lot of lazy biologist's parroting the same garbage junk science. At the time of introduction, Ed Bangs own biologists confirmed 46 canus lupis irremotus in North West Montana alone. Between the confirmed wolves in Montana, and the confirmed wolves in Idaho, combined with over 660 sighting reports, who is really looking to question science? Not one scientific study has been conducted and peer reviewed since wolf "INTRODUCTION"

[illadvised000]

@brandy19588 how can you, you will be busy working the corner ya fat ugly stinky piece of shit skank! That is how you make your money.