Phone Call With Danny Jowenko

Jeff from Canada called Jowenko and asked him a few questions about world trade center building 7

• Category

  News & Politics

[blackhog42]

rip danny

[Ducksoup67]

Danny you were a man of tremendous integrity.  You showed courage and conviction in a time when most men in your field are cowards. Rest in Peace.

[foundfather]

What a Hero! I have no proof, but I believe Danny Jowenko was murdured.

[xadam2dudex]

oh this guy calling is the same guy who called the airplane experts about the black box data from the plane, that the government released, that crashed into the pentagon...he musta made more phone calls than just about the plane data

[VxO4fame]

Weird call but yeah.

[RavenPrecept]

A very difficult one. I do get riled when they say we believe in CTs because we are losers and most debunkers tend to insult us deliberately. However that's an idiotic way of arguing. Roman is obviously bright enough to see the facts could lead to Inside Job but also bright enough to weave them so they don't. It comes down to honesty and loyalty. He is loyal to his position but not honest enough to admit he is wrong. Once he believes two contradictory theories he may crack.

[RavenPrecept]

I did follow someone to their own board. True enough there was room to expand on the topic but the moderator would disallow the best posts in favour of the Inside Job.

[SeenThisScene]

6) We could ask him... but because of the very game he's playing, he cannot give us the truth.

Raven, have you seen this? watch?v=u_Ffz0koJbI

AND do you know of "Rep". Eric Cantor's treason?

There is a reason why Chertoff, Feith, Wolfowitz, Pearle, Cantor etc (and very likely "roman") do what they do. And it is "rational" insofar as it is (for them) "evolutionary".

[SeenThisScene]

5) Ok. So where does that leave us? I don't think R-man is "government shill" (for the reasons in post #1)...or a common troll... so we're left with "idiot" or "unpaid shill" as possibilities. In good faith, I cannot say to you that he's not a idiot. (Sorry, Roman) But I don't think he is. (Yay! Roman!) I believe Roman is of a conviction that, he may know that 9/11 was a false flag attack, but he's arguing otherwise for personal reasons. What reasons could those be?

[SeenThisScene]

4) There is another "4th" possibility: That "roman" is a common "troll". Perhaps some people get something "sexual" out of their trolling. It's like youngster's immature fascination with "ding dong ditch"- only he's well past 13 (I think). Am I assailing "Roman's" character now? Not any more than he is mine when he pulls out this ridiculous "spiritual belief" angle that he thinks motivates "truthers". At any rate, I will forgo labeling him "common troll".