Conspiracy Theories - You Believe them or Not?

You can check out my reverse twin Svengalie here: http://www.youtube.com/user/svengalie

I know that the terrorist attacks are a sensitive area for some people....all I'm saying is that perhaps you shouldn't accept what the government tells you about those incidents.....and sorry if I offend you by saying that....truly.


9/11: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J37jQLIPuqY

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8045542387672451515#

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• conspiracy
• theory
• conspiracy theory
• terrorist attack
• terrorist
• attack
• bombing
• hijack
• fraud
• government
• lies
• alex
• bush
• jones
• order
• world
• automobiles
• motorbike
• motorcycle
• high speed
• offroading
• kayak
• fishing
• high rev engine
• motor sports
• russia
• cars
• bike
• cruiser
• racing
• biking
• illuminati

[texlyon]

@4damskii No, it's based on science and proofs that is known. Not just some shit that stands on the web.

Hade, takk for meg;)

[4damskii]

@texlyon Sigh. I normally don't want to express myself this way in an argument, but I see no point in continuing with you. Read up on the subject. Your 'opinion' is based on nothing but ignorance.

Tack och hej.

[texlyon]

@4damskii Why does everyobdy talk about the melting of steel?

Don't you think the explotion, and the impact of a plane hitting the steel bent them? And when they are bent, they can't hold that much weight. It broke and it started to fall on top of the others that broke, because they got tons of tons of a falling building. This also leading the building to get crushed straight down. That's what i think happened. BTW, the gravity goes straight down.

[4damskii]

@texlyon Subconsciously assumed you were American, sorry.

I speak of nano thermite - thought you'd have picked up on that from my first comment. Molten steel, which you've probably heard of though (temperature of burning jet fuel debate) is the bi-product of that.

It's funny that you think you know better than the aforementioned group of experts that call for a new investigation - buildings simply don't behave that way, and certainly not due to fires. Remember - Building 7 wasn't hit.

[texlyon]

@4damskii 1: im in norway, so it's not my governemt, im not trying to defend it. Because i think they suck.

2: Never heard about those "devices" If they eaven are real.

3: The upper part of the building fell on top of the other, something that will make the building go straight down, and not tip like some of the buildings do when the explotions are at the bottom. 

[4damskii]

@texlyon Okay. How do you explain the large quantities of unignited incendiary devices 1000 times thinner than a human hair found throughout the dust of Manhattan? Or the way Building 7 'collapsed' perfectly into it's own footprint. Or the thousands of architects and engineers demanding a new investigation - because the official one -hear this- never even considered testing for explosives. They wanted "a new Pearl Harbor". They orchestrated one. Your governments words, not mine.

[texlyon]

@4damskii 9/11? Serious? Dude, you got shitty proof for it.

[4damskii]

I believe the 9/11 theory to be pretty much indisputable. Like, nano thermite--case closed. There's no arguing against it. Some alien theories I want to believe in, but not sure if I can. Though astronauts and fighter pilots as witnesses are hard to dismiss.

I do however, think that believing that we've never been to the moon is rather ignorant. With so much documentation done I can't see why people still cling on to it. Especially when they're willing to buy stories about aliens.

[Odom1992]

Interesting point of view. IMO They're called theories for a reason. I strictly don't agree with any of the symbolism based theories. Even though they do find a chink in my armour.

Personally, I don't beleive in any of the stories that people churn out, however, they do highlight the fact that things aren't always as the government feeds us.