NH: Nashua PD tails freedom activists (Live Report)
Top Comments
Video Responses
All Comments (54)
-
Hey ASS HOLE! Your state will follow California and will ban open carry. I hope you end up in prison! Fucking racist idiots!
-
@militarysims Plus the fact that gangs are violent, and freestaters are not ...
Actually, the bureaucrats fit the description of a gang far better. They both have leaders and do use violence to get what they want. They even have territories, and enforce monopolies on the trade of certain goods, like alcohol!
-
A quick correction: the MIAC report did not eminate from DHS (duh), it originated from the missouri information analysis center. DHS came out with their own report, which came under fire for including "returning vets" among their potential "domestic terrorists". After the recent militia event, ac-360 had the splc spokesperson who demeaned DHS for backing down. He espouses the demonization of just about everyone. The militia event was provacatured by a federal agent, which is par for the course.
-
Are you familiar with the MIAC report? If not, it's worth a read to see how they have stereotyped people who hold certain beliefs, beliefs that are perfectly legal to hold under the constitution, but ap[parently cause alarm to law enforcement. DHS has also come out with reports using similar rhetoric, and including returning vets as potential terrorists.
-
@slewofdamascus I gotcha. Thanks for the response.
-
The feds, even before the DHS, was corrupting local law enforcement ("free" goodies - nothing is "free", however) and using terror (ruby ridge; waco), and false-flags (ok-city) to demonize citizens who actively oppose the "nwo" (generally), while expanding their reach. After ok-city and then 9-11, local law enforcement has been exponentially "federalized", blurring the lines between federal and state "authority". When feds go "red" so do the local leos. Consider "infra-guard", also.
-
How are you certain that State and Local authorities are following Federal protocols? The Feds are trying to scare them; really warn them, that certain "militia" types are "anti-police". And this is true to an extent... Doesn't mean all Local and State PD are following Federal Protocol. And there's nothing about all protesters being potential domestic terrorists.
We are in uncertain and dark times, but you are being dramatic, man...
-
@VANVALIS Highly unlikely.
-
Once again, you did not answer my question. Justice is not running around kidnapping or assaulting everyone who does something you don't personally approve of. In fact, that's the opposite of justice. You don't own their property, or their body, and as long as they don't harm others, or the property of others, what they do is none of your business.
It's no more moral for the majority to hire people to commit muggings and assault, than it is for an individual.
-
@ninjabunnyman Men who disregard the law and public safety/order, diverse punishment. By God the public is entitled to justice! Thank God we live in a country where even the criminals are given the choice whether to surrender peacefully. If they do not, police are trained to keep the safety of the criminal in mind. Thank God our police are extremely well equipped and trained unlike most nations.
This may be related to the militia events, because I am certain that all local agencies are now following federal protocols, which may involve the survailance of all identified potential domestic terrorists.
They define potential domestic terrorists in the infamous MIAC report from DHS, and that is basically anyone who actively protests against the federal government or its subsidiaries.
I'm not trying to be dramatic but we have entered an uncertain period.
slewofdamascus 1 year ago 14
Does anyone else find it really troubling that citizens have to use such tactics to avoid being picked on by the state (especially after a protest, which is supposed to be a protected practice) ?
MutantBamHammer 1 year ago 8