Can God Be Proven Through the Scientific Method?

http://www.STRplace.org -- Can we prove that God exists through the scientific method? Is that the only method we can use to show that God exists? Brett answers this week's challenge (http://strplace.wordpress.com/2011/11/29/challenge-prove-god-by-the-scientific-­method/).

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• God
• existence
• prove
• science
• scientific
• method
• apologetics
• Stand
• to
• Reason
• Brett
• Kunkle

[EvidenceMinistries]

@ReliableLojic- You totally missed the point. Demanding that God must be proven by the scientific method is a misuse of the tool of science. It is sort of like asking to prove if purple is the sum of 2+2. Mathematics do not prove color.

[CurtGeezus]

You cannot make the argument that my default position should be to assume theism when that entails things that violate the laws of physics. Virgin births and resurrections are not the default position. These views completely conflict with what we observe of the world around us, so if you are to say we should believe them the burden of proof is on you. I'm not one to say the atheist has absolutely no burden but you cannot possibly say these types of things are to be believed unless proven false.

[onehndrdprcntcreep]

ATHIEST ARE JUST PARROT FOLLOWERS OF ARROGANT GOD HATIN SCIENTISTS.WHO CANT FATHOM AN INTELLEGANCE ABOVE THEM.WANT TO KNOW HOW THEY ARE ALL PARROT FOLLOWERS?THEY ALL USE THE SAME DUMB ASS WORD "TROLL"OR"TROLLING".THEY WILL CALL YOU ONE IN A DISAGREEMENT.EVERY SINGLE ATHIEST.NOT A SINGLE ORGINAL,FREE THINKER IN THE WHOLE CLOSED MINDED GROUP.I CANT STAND'EM..........

[jaythecommish]

Great video. Cute kid. Great arguments. The logic of Atheism is laughable. Although they are crafty, if you hang with them long enough they fail, epically. Is that a word? Or should I say academically. Last time I checked when you make a claim either way, both sides need to back it up. If no god, prove it CurtGeezus. Explaining yourself. Prove the non existence of God. Learn about event causation and agent causation. Follow these definitions to their logical end,and you will find God.

[CurtGeezus]

I'm not sure why he thinks that all of science must be done with a ruler...

[speerdali]

Wrong!!! already @ 2:12....Atheism is NOT claiming that God does not exist!!!!! It is the rejection of the claim that God DOES exist based on the lack of any convincing evidence!...full stop!

[oO0E]

@MrVirtualCoder Sorry Mr. Troll. You can try again in a few days I suppose.

Come up with a better argument though because even your theist buddies are laughing at how moronic your approach is.

Good luck!

[MrVirtualCoder]

@oO0E Listen here, little brat. If you are a "non believer" then you are NOT an Atheist, and my proof would be nonsense to you(HENCE "NON BELIEF".). But since you claim to be an Atheist, you assert that God does NOT exist, and therefor YOU must prove that such is true(that he does not exist.).

But you CANNOT. Your beliefs are based on blind faith, and this is something many Atheists do not want to admit.

[oO0E]

@MrVirtualCoder You're trolling right? I refuse to believe you could actually be this moronic.

This will be the last time I say it, as I have no interest in entertaining your nonsense, whether trolling or serious. The one making the claim has the burden of proof. YOU are claiming a god exists. I claim that I don't believe you. If you could think logically for just a second you would realize how stupid what you're saying is, as YOU have never met the burden of proof.

[MrVirtualCoder]

@oO0E Yes i can. But the burden of proof is on the person making the claim that something does not exist( i.e: YOU!).

Can YOU prove that Theism is false? No, i don't think so.

[oO0E]

@MrVirtualCoder For the last time, the person making the claim has the burden of proof. Can you provide that proof or not?