Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Quintezz XT-9500 vs. Valentine One Radarwarner Test .mov

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
20,138
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 19, 2010

Valentine One vs. XT-9500 von Quintezz. Beide Geräte sind gegen die gleiche Radarfalle am gelichen ort angetreten.

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (Ask4Copyrights)

  • detectors has quite similar detection capabilities, but xt9500 cost only the half price ,)

  • In comparison between performance and Unit price is the favorit detector the Quintezz XT-9500.

    The 9500 delivers great performance with a really low price. Whatch Video to see the difference in detection sensitivity. We have tested on same Location with same Ka-Band Radartrap MULTANOVA 6F.

    Conclusion: Quintezz XT-9500 offers best performance combined with low price!

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Grosse arnaque le xt 9500 est une véritable merde j'en ai fait les frais!!

    Depuis février 2011 lors du retour à l'envoyeur toujours aucun remboursement malgré de nombreux appels. Ne vous faites pas avoir comme moi.

  • which one wins?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more