Invincible Mongols
Top Comments
All Comments (253)
-
I love the descriptions. :))
Fanatical kid....
-
@OfficialPandorAvatar I am taught that the Spanish brought a disease (measles or common cold) and indeed made the tribes fight each other more than usual. but according to the records of Spanish priests the numbers in the Aztec cities grew over a milion, and so did their army.
-
@gaoth88 Just I was saying to @12punisher.
However, I think native people was not that many (except Indians in India).
I think Native Americans were fewer than Colonising Invaders.Also much of the land were unpopulated,so only people that Europians had to fight were Mayans and Aztec, and few native americans.
Aztecs were already falling, but Spanish did not fight directly, they gave money and weopan to other neighboring clans to fight Aztec Empire.Then they only conquered Tenochtitlan.
-
@OfficialPandorAvatar I know this is old. but when you enter enemy lands you don;t want to rampage, you want to conquer with as little death as possible, anyone who fights other than for peace, wealth and land, is a fool and should be put away. and the Spanish could have used swords, but against thousands of natives...it isn't much a good plan, tactics and superior weaponry can be both smart and coward. and the ottoman were way of for the Spanish. know your geography!!
-
1955 Albanian cavarly were defeat mongolian so heavy they never repair from that. Albania rules. long live USA-United states of Albania. Rrnoft Shqiperia Ethnike
-
@AlexanderIves So we have to read a book to understand art of war.
Mongolian never read a book to understant art of war, neither turkics and huns.
What the hell are talking about.Mongolian horse archers can not always shoot arrows, one archers had a max of 20 arrows.So some point of it, it will run out. And Heavy caviliray will charge.
When 2 heavy cavilary meet each other would not that be hand to hand or 1 on 1
What you are talking about does not make sense.Usually europians had more soldiers
-
@OfficialPandorAvatar Obviously, you didn't understand my comment....... I simply pointed out that individually, a European knight would have defeated a Mongol in hand to hand. Secondly what the hell about the art of war??? Have you even read the book? Thirdly, I never questioned the ability of the Mongol army...
-
@AlexanderIves First of all that is called art of war.
Secondly, Mongolian use horse archer who can fire in the middle of the battle.On the other hand,Europian has to stay in steady position to fire an arrow.
Also if your knight was that good,how the hell they afraid of fighting Mongol Horsemans.
We killed Europian best knight in number of battle.
After all Mongolians cant fire arrows all the time, one horse man has max of 20 arrows, so europian knight has to fight 1 on 1, still they lost.
-
Really, if you guys were so strong why did you used gun agains native people who had only poorly armed spear and arrow.
Is that sign of bravery.
Also,your best empire did not invade any strong kingdoms,(Britania weak native americans and australians, and gived money to start civil war in India)
Spain paid lot of gold to take down Aztics.
Come on you guys had everything in 15th century. But you did not got guts to fight agains empires like Ottoman.
You guys are weak and cowards.
lol it sounds like you threw rocks in a dryer
grayhawk12 1 year ago 11
never fight the mongols on open ground, lure them ino forrests or your cities for seige battles, anywhere that their cavalry is hindered is a good place.
without their cavalry, they are just like any other enemy
Mikeybetts 8 months ago