Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Neal Adams Interview

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
1,942
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Feb 11, 2008

Neal Adams, legendary artist for Batman, X-Men, Green Lantern and many others discusses his new Batman series.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (16)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • didn't give a hoot about the batman until frank did the dark knight

  • @waynetech10 Miller hasn't destroyed Batman at all. Frank Miller reinvigorated Batman in 1986 with DKR and Year One and made Batman hot again. Miller brought Batman closer to his dark roots than anyone else had, more in line with the original character as created by Bill Finger and Bob Kane. Miller's DK2 was also a huge seller. Miller's All-Star is also a huge seller. Adams asked Miller to dialogue Odyssey for him. Their friends. If you want more Adams Batman get the Batman Illustrated books.

  • Dang it! Frank Miller has destroyed Batman enough. He should stick to his own innovations and quite writing abominations under the DC brand. But, it'll be good to Adams' artwork, again. The period he was involved in is one of the best Batman eras to date. I've been trying to collect more of those stories from the 70s. Legendary stuff.

  • For yer questions 1-3, he answers 2 and 3. FREE of charge????? You are in AMERICA buddy. Don't make me laugh! And if U don't have the whole concept, then U shouldn't speak negatively of it. That would be responsible. I shouldn't say he covers EVERYTHING. Just like I warned he's not perfect and must be wrong on many things, but is at least in the correct direction. He's way closer to the truth than pangea and subduction. I can mail U a copy of the dvd if U want. I believe in free education.

  • "You do know that you should understand the entire concept before you cast it away so ignorantly, don't you? "

    Then I would like you to therefore tell me where I can get the WHOLE concept, FREE OF CHARGE, so I can know exactly what his theory is. Does he explain EVERYTHING: the lack of mid-Coruscic ridge, the processes going on at the ocean trenches, the generation of matter similar to that already present, etc.? And all back it up with rock-hard proof? If not, he's wrong.

  • Is that a "FFUUKK, I can't believe the awesomeness of that!" or a "FFUUKK, I can't believe that crap is gonna happen!" ? If the ladder, I might strongly agree. But if the former, well it MIGHT be and I think that really all depends on Neal. Frank can't get away w/bullshit with Neal around. Neal would smack him like a little bitch and put him back in his place. So really, it's as if Neal is seeing what's Frank got to offer, soley because of DKR and all the PR franky has had.

  • ...w/that said, I don't think Neal's got the whole thing correct. I believe he is quite wrong on many levels which none of us could even foresee. I believe this because nobody is perfect, but I do know,by logic alone,he is in the correct direction. Say pangea is "south" and "North" is the actual truth. Neal would be "Northeast" or even only "east" at the very least. He definitely got off "south".

  • I can't say I have that much confidence in your claim of doing your homework on Adams theory, due to the statements you just made. You asked questions which he already addressed. I'm inclined to believe that for whatever it is you ARE looking at, you have looked over and over again as you said. But you have to look at the complete theory,otherwise out of context. Perhaps the material is simply not available to U other than those vids on his site. I bought da dvd, $40, he covers everything.

  • "You do know that you should understand the entire concept before you cast it away so ignorantly, don't you? "

    Actually, I have looked at it again and again and noticed real problems with it.

    For example, it does not explain matter duplication: why the matter that formed was similar to that already present. Nor where the energy comes from that turns to matter. (Although I think once something akin to zero-point energy was mentioned but that's a whole can of worms in itself).

Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more