9/11 Truth on Fox News, Fresno, California
Top Comments
All Comments (29)
-
@ctcole77 No, I'm not ignoring the final report. What gave you the idea I was?
-
So you're just ignoring NIST's final WTC 7 report released in August of 2008?
Just like you ignore evidence, facts, science, and eyewitness.
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
-
@ctcole77 NIST wrote a preliminary report on WTC7 in 2005; it was attached at Appendix L to the NCSTAR 1 report. Maybe if you'd do your homework you wouldn't indulge such peculiar notions.
-
@ctcole77 I didn't make any false claims. Have you seen the "Solving the Mystery of WTC7" video yet?
watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw Over 200,000 views in 2 weeks!
-
Failure first occurred all the way to the roof line-involving all three interior columns on the easternmost side of the building (79, 80, 81). Then, progressing from east to west across WTC 7, all of the columns failed in the core of the building (58 through 78). Finally, the entire façade collapsed.
Oh, in case you didn't know, NIST came out with their findings in 2008, NOT 2005.
Nice try lying shill!
911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!
-
This collapse of floors left Column 79 insufficiently supported in the east-west direction over nine stories.
The unsupported Column 79 then buckled and triggered an upward progression of floor system failures that reached the building's east penthouse. What followed in rapid succession was a series of structural failures.
-
Eventually, a girder on Floor 13 lost its connection to a critical column, Column 79, that provided support for the long floor spans on the east side of the building (see Diagram 1). The displaced girder and other local fire-induced damage caused Floor 13 to collapse, beginning a cascade of floor failures down to the 5th floor. Many of these floors had already been at least partially weakened by the fires in the vicinity of Column 79.
-
You might want to actually read NIST's finding before you start making false claims.
"The heat from the uncontrolled fires caused steel floor beams and girders to thermally expand, leading to a chain of events that caused a key structural column to fail. The failure of this structural column then initiated a fire-induced progressive collapse of the entire building."
-
@ctcole77 According to NIST, structural damage from WTC1 debris played no part in the collapse initiation of WTC7.
It always amuses me when defenders of the official accounts invent fanciful theories that the officials have repudiated.
Do your homework. Start with FEMA's chapter on WTC7 (about 20 pages) and NIST's Appendix L to their 2005 report (about 50 pages). Then you can go on to the 2008 WTC7 reports.
-
Nice try but there were MANY factors contributing to WTC 7's collapse. And the tranfers trusses DID contribute.
I suppose thousands of tons of concrete and steel falling hundreds of feet on WTC 7 had NOTHING to do with the collapse?
How about the 30 foot hole in WTC 7's facade?
How about the southwest corner of WTC chopped off?
Please explain firefighters predicting WTC 7's collapse HOURS ahead?
911 TRUTH = 911 LIES
Good video.
PersianPaladin 2 years ago 11
It's sad that a video made by the BBC called "the power of knightmares" which proves that AL-QAEDA DOES NOT EXIST added 2 years ago on UTube has got about 94000 views but a video about Anna Nicole Smith also added 2 years ago has received 2 315 000 views!!!!!!!!! No wonder the general public is getting fucked in the ass by the elites welcome to the Matrix
SirQubit 2 years ago 4