Re: Impossible puzzle

I think 2d stuff is interesting because it challenges natural 3d perception. Even if it's utterly stupid and "FAKE" I think it's still something to consider in terms of the puzzle.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Impossible puzzle
• 2d
• proof

[lykenth08]

i think i have a solution - an actual one

[Redflowers9]

@lykenth08 Imagine a house with three supplies connected to it. Dot to dot supplies. Imagine another house with three lines connecting to shape. There's always one connection covered from last house.

[wertio7]

ever tried the window...

[Redflowers9]

@wertio7 ah sh*t... lol

[hansiraber]

i think the puzzle doesn't change if stuff is rearranged.

if you could find another argument why you're allowed to move the houses around you'd have a very nice visual proof,

i like it :)

math is about reasoning in general, not just about using equations!

[Redflowers9]

@hansiraber I had a think, lol, this would only work with moving 1 type, you're allowed to move one type around because if they don't work in any position then they wont work in their original one

[lykenth08]

@Redflowers9 May i ask if you have watched my video of the solution i came up with?

[Redflowers9]

@mgs1398 no... this is a video response to a proper proof of why it's *impossible* to find a solution and I've just made an attempt to show spatially why it isn't possible either and so whether it's challenging where the stuff is put is irrelevant. I'm just basically moving the lines to make an impenetrable shape so I needn't of moved the houses but I guess it looked clearer although it clearly isn't so my bad I guess. lol thnx for watching

[mgs1398]

i no that it isnt in the rules that you cant the utilities around but thats what makes it chalenging so basically by oving them around your destroying the purpose

[Redflowers9]

@jinxtgaming yep, it becomes easy to see why it's impossible :)