The Four Horsemen: Dawkins, Dennett, Harris, Hitchens (7/12)

*NOTE: This video is the first part of Episode II of The Four Horsemen.

On the 30th of September 2007, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Christopher Hitchens sat down for a first-of-its-kind, unmoderated 2-hour discussion, convened by RDFRS and filmed by Josh Timonen.

All four authors have recently received a large amount of media attention for their writings against religion - some positive, and some negative. In this conversation the group trades stories of the public's reaction to their recent books, their unexpected successes, criticisms and common misrepresentations. They discuss the tough questions about religion that face to world today, and propose new strategies for going forward.

Credit:
The Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science
http://richarddawkins.net/

If you are interested in purchasing a high-quality DVD of this presentation, you can find it here:
http://richarddawkins.net/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&products...

(Note: All proceeds from the sale of this DVD will go to the Ayaan Hirsi Ali Security Trust.)

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Atheism
• Atheist
• Richard
• Dawkins
• Daniel
• Dennett
• Sam
• Harris
• Christopher
• Hitchens
• Religion
• Christianity
• Islam

[auggiedoggy]

We've got fossils! [high five]

[Wmagic1990]

thumbs up if you wish you could be there drinking with the 4 KINGS.

[hbknutjack]

@auggiedoggy We do? Oh shit. Well pack it up scientists and logical people. War's over!

[TomVodkaCollins]

*muses* Hmmm...if I were in the room, I'd ask Santa for a bigger table and an extra-long table clothe. }^D

[maulzor]

Santa is drinking a fuckin Martini.

[writersblock26]

@auggiedoggy What?

[ThanksDoctorThoctor]

they gots a cameras mans 

[cloudbusterman]

The Original Four Horsemen failed Saviors in 70AD were like Bible Judges 4 Armageddon hero.

He too probably indulged the so-called Naturalistic Fallacy of taking IS as OUGHTs, as is inherently characteristic of all mental materialists, though a 7-fold categorical error. They take selected Facts (whats) as instrumental OUGHTs (whys) as though mysticly deifying them for blind trust one-sided use, always failing to cognize higher order homeodynamic system of emergent properties and control feedback

[Propagandhi900]

Hitchens has a buzzon by now haha.