Micro vs Macro Evolution is Bunk

Challenge to christians to find the limitations of mutations in DNA

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Micro
• Macro
• evolution
• bunk
• kalin666
• kalin
• religion
• christian
• god
• darwin
• dna
• faith
• science
• atheist
• atheism
• jesus
• jezuz

[zenithar6666]

how do we get from a cell to anything other then a modifed cell or group of cells when evolution can only modify what is already there? inculding the hereditary history and informatinon in that organism? makes no sense

[kalin666]

@zenithar6666 it looks like you just answered your own question

[cursedcreation]

sorry dude! Bacterial Flagellum Motors don't evolve!!

[kalin666]

wow, you're like 60 years behind . . . . . and just lazy, a simple trip to the library can clear this one up. Now stop worshiping the god of the gaps and read the bible.

[malthusia]

Yes! You can find plenty of bias propiganda on the topic of evolution to indoctrinate your self with down at your local library!! where a sound observable science such as micro evolution and adaptation is bastardized and perverted into an angry, atheistic, pseudo religion called Macro Evolution!!.

[kalin666]

how old is the earth?

[glendaweil]

Macro never happened so micro is all you have you want someone to tell you the limitations instead show me where macro happened prove what you are saying you know what you can't all you can show is micro and say macro and micro are the same just add time more nonsense.

[HConstantine]

According to creationists one cat kind pair evovled into lions, Hyenas cougars, housecats, all within a few generations ( since depictions of lions and housecats occur in Egpytian art ca. 2000 BC). After that nothing. You'd think the burden of proof would be on them to show the responsible mechanism. But somehow it never turns out that way.

[PinkProgram]

@csouca there are limits to what a specific individual can mutate but the only limit in a population is the ability to breed. A population can exhibit a range of mutation that would be lethal if suddenly introduced to an individual. If a daughter population is separated from the parent population the concentration of these mutations can make the daughter population incapable of breeding with the parent population after a few generations of separation as has been observed in fruit flies ^_^

[pilgrimpater]

This is a very good question and it looks like that 4.5 years later not one creotard has been able to answer your question.

The irony is that, according to their flood myth, the number of "microevolution" mutations required would exceed anything proposed by traditional biology. In other words Genesis necessitates super evolution. Also if therewas a limitation then it should be possible for a tiger to produce a lion and vice versa. As usual creotradery self destructs.

[wallyjude3]

@kalin666; I was going to respond to your request until the end of your video changed my mind. Such immature displays don't win you any points pal. I would suggest if you want someone to respond to your question you grow up & act like a mature adult, not some petulant child.

[bftjosh]

You need an explanation of Micro and Macro evolution dude. Search MicroEvolution vs MacroEvolution and then click the first video with the uploader's name being CDK007 Watch that and stop having such a closed mind on the topic.

[TheSeventhSon]

I've been presenting this exact same question to creationist youtubers. They never respond back...