Talk 'N' Roll - Bootleg vs. Official Live Release

The Frustrated Rockstars discuss the pros and cons of official live albums by artists such as Peter Frampton, Led Zeppelin, and Kiss, versus raw bootleg recordings. Opening Act: Ozzy sues Tony Iommi over Black Sabbath dispute.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• ozzy
• black
• sabbath
• led
• zeppelin
• song
• remains
• the
• same
• grateful
• dead
• kiss
• concerts
• bootleg
• chickenfoot

[fl00dsm0k3]

i can name three members of iron maiden steve bruce and nicco

[camarotoro]

again , kiss came out with KISS alive in early 1975 and was the first real live album to sell like crazy by any band at the time,,,kiss had no real money or budget to fix any live parts on that album ,,you hear the mistakes!!..it was a breakthrough album ,,then Zep followed in 1976 with the song remains the same and frampton in 1977...kiss should get credit for this because zep was leader,,and here we had zeppelin following kiss...great job guys.

[professorMMP]

You guys are awesome. I've always found that official releases (live concert footage) lack any feeling & the camera angles jump around too much for my taste. Bootlegs, both from the video perspective and the audo, give you a bit of the feel of the live performance.