AUTO '03 MUSTANG GT 25-105 MPH

Bone stock on this run. Pretty slow right? Not for long though...

Some info I want to share about this run:


- The tires have the same mileage as the car
- The road is curved to the left
- The road is pretty bumpy
- 245/45 R17 tires
- Half tank

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• 2003
• Ford
• Mustang
• GT
• MPH
• Automatic
• Stock
• 03
• Flooring
• 105
• 100
• RWD
• Stang
• 4R70W
• 4.6L
• 2V
• SOHC
• V8
• Fast
• Slow

[B1GRY]

You should do more videos man

[FILIPINOTUNER]

Tell me about it...

Give me a suggestion if you'd like, I don't have anything new so there's not much to make a video about.

Money is one of the biggest obstacle in my way of building my car... :)

[superdriver777]

Wheelspin goin into second in an automatic? Not bad for stock

[superAero32]

finally found a vid with an auto gt!!

i have one too :D just got it this week all stock

thx for the vid bruh!

[03p71]

The engine note at the top of the RPM (5200 and up) sounds sooo good. The crown vics make the same noise too. Gotta love that 4.6 high RPM howl.

[imailwizz]

mmmm, i do love the mustang sound. man oh man.

[Noahsebb88]

@1993hondaaccord I don't want to sound like an asshole, but the 99-04 GTs run low 14s. Car and Driver, Motortrend, and a couple others posted the official quarter time as 14.2. Just a friendly correction, even if the autos are probably running mid to high 14s anyway. I've got an 03 GT and I have too much fun driving it to care that it's really not that fast.

[1993hondaaccord]

@TheDylan222222 Yeah those do pretty well. The only bad thing about them really are the brakes. I have heard that over like 80 mph they are almost useless. But with new brakes, a little suspension work, and some engine mods, they can be a very good all around car. I was looking at foxbodies before I got my lude.

[TheDylan222222]

@1993hondaaccord i would like a must Lx foxbody with the 5.0 there nice cars and pritty quick

[1993hondaaccord]

@TheDylan222222 Nice man, what you looking at for a vehicle?

[TheDylan222222]

@1993hondaaccord i know sticks are faster and ur not a ricer lol my next car is ganna be a manual alot more fun 2 drive and more realible

[1993hondaaccord]

@TheDylan222222 A cvt is faster than a traditional auto tranny, but often just a tick slower then a manual. Although like everything, it has it's drawbacks... Any car guy, such as myself, will notice an annoying whine coming from the tranny. CVTs are also known to be more taxing on the engine... Oh and btw I drive a 2000 Honda Prelude type sh that is bone stock, and runs low 15s in the quarter mile. Which is only a tick slower then this body style mustang gt (which runs mid to high 14s normally)

[1993hondaaccord]

@TheDylan222222 Wow ricer... I didn't see that one coming!!! Oh thats right, thats only the millionth time i have heard that insult... If you take the same car in manual and auto, and the driver of the manual is good with at shifting, then the manual will win every time. Although you are probably referring to a CVT or continuously variable transmission. A cvt, unlike an automatic, doesn't have set gear ratios. This, in theory allows for better acceleration and fuel economy.

[TheDylan222222]

@1993hondaaccord well autos can be faster maybe if u would look it up u would find out now y dont u go down shift u little ricer down the track and hit the big 19 sec at the 1/4