@TheMrwildboar Are you reading my comments correctly?I'm against the wars and believe 911 was an inside job.However,I'll stand by my comment it was done just to start the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq though that's part of it.It was done to start the 'war on terror' a war against a non-existent enemy that they could claim was active ANYWHERE they wanted a war for whatever reason (even at home to justify the loss of civil liberties) it was for the 2 wars so far.
@waitew Yes they would because they don't care about what people think they only listen to the generals and all the hype they say. Greedy bastards no wonder it's the most hated country in the world.
@waitew Bollocks what about iraq they will go to war because they are bullys and try to police the world so that no one else can become richer then themselves. no one supported vietnam but they still stuck there nose in, America is the biggest terroist nation superpower freaks. Not to mention they are paranoid and trigger happy rednecks. They lost the war in Vietnam, Afganistan, and Iraq just creating more enemys in doing so. What a waste of civilian and military lives. Get the fuck away
@theBartone9119 The war on terror is designed to replace the Cold War by giving us a new enemy.One not tied to any one country that can be claimed to be active anywhere we want a war for whatever reason (resources-oil) even at home to justify the loss of civil liberties.If terrorism hadn't replace Communism who would the enemy be today? what would the defense budget look like?Would we be militarily entrenched in the Middle East where the world's energy is Concentrated with no911
@theBartone9119 It wasn't done just to start the wars.Here's 2 fundamental truths that help to explain it:1.The people wont pay for a huge military/CIA unless they believe there's a huge threat/enemy that makes it necessary.
2.The people wont support a war unless they believe it to be for a noble cause.
With the fall of Communism there was no huge threat to justify a huge military/CIA.And though we were the Sole superpower we couldn't us it without 911.
@waitew I'm supposed to believe that the US government devised this evil plot to take two planes, destroy two economic beacons, their own Pentagon ect. just to get people to rally behind a war? You know the gov survives off tax dollars right? 911 was a huge blow to the economy, recovery was costly...If the US wants to go to war, history proves they will. The "motive" for this conspiracy is more than laughable. And the similar "drills" you spoke of were already debunked in 2007. *sigh*
@waitew If the US wants to attack a county, they will do it in the name of "helping our allies", they will do it in the name of "nuclear threats". I mean look at Vietnam, nobody supported that war and they did it in the name of "helping their allies". They dont' give a shit if the people don't want a war, nobody wanted the war in Iraq (it's finally over), but they did it anyway.
@waitew The government also denied that they knew something like that would happen, but in reality Bush had several warnings but just kept practicing his golf swings after quickly flipping through intelligence briefings. He was a dumbass, he fucked up, so the US gov did whatever they could to make it seem like it couldn't have been prevented. It could have..
@waitew They said the US was attacked because of their freedoms, but Osama was very explicit in why he attacked the US. The American government supports Israel, which is Islam's enemy, and Osama specifically stated that the US governments involvement in the middle east prior to 911 and their support for Israel is why it happened.
steve jones please stop chuckling.. at test, at keynote speeches.. good nature we appreciate - mirth isn't a necessary part
newsmanbluesman 1 month ago
@TheMrwildboar Are you reading my comments correctly?I'm against the wars and believe 911 was an inside job.However,I'll stand by my comment it was done just to start the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq though that's part of it.It was done to start the 'war on terror' a war against a non-existent enemy that they could claim was active ANYWHERE they wanted a war for whatever reason (even at home to justify the loss of civil liberties) it was for the 2 wars so far.
waitew 1 month ago
@waitew Yes they would because they don't care about what people think they only listen to the generals and all the hype they say. Greedy bastards no wonder it's the most hated country in the world.
TheMrwildboar 1 month ago
@waitew Bollocks what about iraq they will go to war because they are bullys and try to police the world so that no one else can become richer then themselves. no one supported vietnam but they still stuck there nose in, America is the biggest terroist nation superpower freaks. Not to mention they are paranoid and trigger happy rednecks. They lost the war in Vietnam, Afganistan, and Iraq just creating more enemys in doing so. What a waste of civilian and military lives. Get the fuck away
TheMrwildboar 1 month ago
@theBartone9119 The war on terror is designed to replace the Cold War by giving us a new enemy.One not tied to any one country that can be claimed to be active anywhere we want a war for whatever reason (resources-oil) even at home to justify the loss of civil liberties.If terrorism hadn't replace Communism who would the enemy be today? what would the defense budget look like?Would we be militarily entrenched in the Middle East where the world's energy is Concentrated with no911
waitew 2 months ago
@theBartone9119 It wasn't done just to start the wars.Here's 2 fundamental truths that help to explain it:1.The people wont pay for a huge military/CIA unless they believe there's a huge threat/enemy that makes it necessary.
2.The people wont support a war unless they believe it to be for a noble cause.
With the fall of Communism there was no huge threat to justify a huge military/CIA.And though we were the Sole superpower we couldn't us it without 911.
waitew 2 months ago
@waitew I'm supposed to believe that the US government devised this evil plot to take two planes, destroy two economic beacons, their own Pentagon ect. just to get people to rally behind a war? You know the gov survives off tax dollars right? 911 was a huge blow to the economy, recovery was costly...If the US wants to go to war, history proves they will. The "motive" for this conspiracy is more than laughable. And the similar "drills" you spoke of were already debunked in 2007. *sigh*
theBartone9119 2 months ago
@waitew If the US wants to attack a county, they will do it in the name of "helping our allies", they will do it in the name of "nuclear threats". I mean look at Vietnam, nobody supported that war and they did it in the name of "helping their allies". They dont' give a shit if the people don't want a war, nobody wanted the war in Iraq (it's finally over), but they did it anyway.
theBartone9119 2 months ago
@waitew The government also denied that they knew something like that would happen, but in reality Bush had several warnings but just kept practicing his golf swings after quickly flipping through intelligence briefings. He was a dumbass, he fucked up, so the US gov did whatever they could to make it seem like it couldn't have been prevented. It could have..
theBartone9119 2 months ago
@waitew They said the US was attacked because of their freedoms, but Osama was very explicit in why he attacked the US. The American government supports Israel, which is Islam's enemy, and Osama specifically stated that the US governments involvement in the middle east prior to 911 and their support for Israel is why it happened.
theBartone9119 2 months ago