Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Pro-Test Promo Video

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
4,180
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on May 21, 2007

It seems my premier skills are improving , Basically I've just taken a chunk of "monkeys rats and me" and synced it with the same music from the WinHEC / PDC keynote . I think it came out prity good considering the low quality of the original rip.

Pro-Test is a pro animal testing organization which was set up to combat animal rights extremists and was remarkably successful , Over 750 people from all community's marched in favour of animal testing compared to the 200 SPEAK could muster .

You can see their home page here www.pro-test.org.uk .

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (AlphaAddict)

  • You might care to tag

    "pro-test"

    "Laurie"

    "Pycroft"

    Good job - was all of the footage really in MR&M?

  • Yeah at the end of it its the pro-test march i didnt have to dso much it all seemes to sync rather well .

    Im setting up a similar org in ireland with a few colege buddies .

Video Responses

This video is a response to Animal Rights Extremists
see all

All Comments (32)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 1983

    The great majority of perinatal toxicological studies seem to be intended to convey medico-legal protection to the pharmaceutical houses and political protection to the official regulatory bodies, rather than produce information that might be of value in human therapeutics. Prof Hawkins, Drugs and Pregnancy: Human Teratogenesis and Related Problems, p 41-49 (publ. Churchill Livingstone).

  • @thrashitupX I didnt say what you have put in quotes here. Here is another real quote for you..."The problem with animal carcinogenicity tests is not their lack of sensitivity for human carcinogens, but rather their lack of human specificity. A positive result has poor predictive value for humans." Knight, Bailey & Balcombe, British Medical Journal USA, Vol. 5, p477. 2005

  • @66bluesboysam the medical research on animals does not save lives either, it is the reason diseases remain uncured. see quotes ive entered or go to curedisease. net

  • @noratmedicine typical response when you know that an objective perspective does not agree with your ideas, "Wikpedia is biased, ITS A CONSPIRACY I TELL YOU!!!!" god, you sound like those conservatives who always whine the media is against them, when really it is the facts.

  • @naymelessmoonlight Quotes by doctors/scientists may fill that criteria curedisease. net mrmcmed. org speakcampaigns. org vivisectionresearch. ca a re a few to start with. I think the fundamental facts speak for them selves, 60million animals a year killed in 'research', 30,000 diseases to choose from and nine are cured, an apalling failure, not to mention the fact that the substances which pass animal 'tests' harm humans, anything will pass. wikipedia is only as good as its contributors

  • Pro test is astro turf (fake grass roots) I wonder how many in this march do not derive income, titles or qualifications from animal experiments or are not related to or friends of those who do or have not been mislead by such people."The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse... We have cured mice of cancer for decades - and it simply didn't work in humans." Dr. Richard Klausner, as director of the US National Cancer Institute curedisease. net mrmcmed. org

  • The US National Cancer Institute also undertook a 25 year screening programme, testing 40,000 plant species on animals for anti-tumour activity. Out of the outrageously expensive research, many positive results surfaced in animal models, but not a single benefit emerged for humans. As a result, the NCI now uses human cancer cells for cytotoxic screening.

    Handbook of Laboratory Animal Science, Volume II Animal Models Svendensen and Hau (Eds.) CRC Press 1994 p4. curedisease. net mrmcmed. org

  • OK Does Mascara Or Deoderant Or Or Shampoo Save Lifes Because Beauty Products Are The Number 1 Most Things Used For Animal Testing

  • Thanks for the propoganda video. "The history of cancer research has been a history of curing cancer in the mouse... We have cured mice of cancer for decades - and it simply didn't work in humans." Dr. Richard Klausner, as director of the US National Cancer Institute For more truth saee curedisease . net mrmcmed . org vivisectionresearch . ca speakcampaigns . org

  • Why would anyone be 'pro-test'? Why can't we work together to find better, modern, cutting edge research that does not use animals? The Draize rabbit eye test has been replaced just recently, thanks to research done by the Dr Hadwen Trust foundation, set up to fund and develop non-animal alternatives. There are many examples of where researchers have been able to come up with alternatives. Anything is possible, we can solve this for all, a win/win for animals AND people. That's where to focus.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more