Obvious CGI Job? Some folks will say anything but the truth of the matter: They dont know CGI if it hit them in the ass? Stop using CGI as an excuse to attempt to debunk, when you don't know what CGI is? CGI did not exist in 1952.
@AnaiBendai That said, I'm not discounting the fact that there WERE indeed UFO's over Washington D.C. in 1952. There were hundreds of eye-witnesses. It was in all the papers. UFO's DID indeed buzz the Capitol Bldg, but unfortunately this footage is not real.
Where did this footage come from? It looks like an obvious CGI job. Everything moves way too smooth. Cameras only had very limited shutter speeds back then but the UFO's all seem to "glide" as though they were a product of video accereration. This was NOT filmed in 1952.
Obvious CGI Job? Some folks will say anything but the truth of the matter: They dont know CGI if it hit them in the ass? Stop using CGI as an excuse to attempt to debunk, when you don't know what CGI is? CGI did not exist in 1952.
UFOwga 8 months ago
@AnaiBendai That said, I'm not discounting the fact that there WERE indeed UFO's over Washington D.C. in 1952. There were hundreds of eye-witnesses. It was in all the papers. UFO's DID indeed buzz the Capitol Bldg, but unfortunately this footage is not real.
AnaiBendai 8 months ago
Where did this footage come from? It looks like an obvious CGI job. Everything moves way too smooth. Cameras only had very limited shutter speeds back then but the UFO's all seem to "glide" as though they were a product of video accereration. This was NOT filmed in 1952.
AnaiBendai 8 months ago
They don't look like any moths I've seen
BWGgy 8 months ago
those are some mighty awesome weather balloons. didn't know they had super advanced weather balloons back in that time.
vutEwa 1 year ago