Congressman Ron Paul says government should not stop Swine Flu
Uploader Comments (UnsavoryMen)
Top Comments
-
WHO just announced the swine flu pandemic as over. Tons of money were wasted on vaccinations. And like I commented more than a year ago, the regular flu killed more people than H1N1. I'm not making light of the deaths, I'm just saying the media and the government sensationalized this whole incident, and you, UnsavoryMen, fell for it. I mean when the first cases of swine flu deaths show that they all had other underlying health problems, you can probably bet it's not gonna be an epic disaster.
-
The CDC estimates that an average of 36,000 people die in the U.S. each year from the common flu.
Out of the 27,717 cases of swine flu in the U.S., less than 1 percent have died. Many that have died usually had pre-existing health complications. As long as you're young and healthy, you shouldn't be afraid of swine flu.
Swine flu is bad, but it's not the black plague. Put it into perspective and even the common flu is worse. Paul's against forced vaccinations because they can cause deaths.
Video Responses
All Comments (58)
-
I'm surprised you keep this video up considering it demonstrates that he was right.
-
I just watched all your unsavory videos... they were funny.
:34 "Isn't it a common sense to be safe than to be sorry?" Now that's funny.
-
@eiendeeai (cont) The other possibilites include a false flag operation to test the compliance of the public to "dire" warnings from the government. With the urgency to get some sort of shot that was rapidly developed and not tested.
-
@eiendeeai The telling statistic is that fewer people died worldwide of this swine flu than die in the US during an average annual flu season. The shocking statistic is that way this flu spread. It did not follow normal spread patterns. Appearing in multiple places at the same time can only be casued by man. This was either a real attempt at causing a true pandemic, WHO announcements about severity were canned press releases with no relation to reality. (cont)
-
@UnsavoryMen You are an ignorant fool. The symptoms of both the flu and supposed 'swine flu' were the fucking same. When the poor unfortunates who died of regular flu were reported to the medical system, the scum there called it 'more swine flu victims'. Get a clue, it wasnt 36000+27717, it was what the average is of normal flu related cases each year. DICKHEAD.
-
If you look away from the crap appearing on the video, you hear the words of a very wise man. Nobody died from the 'swine flu' bullshite last year or its first alleged outbreak. How right he was! :D
-
Why don't you leave American politics to Americans and focus on the politics of your own country.
-
Yeah, nice try., but Ron Paul was 100% right. 25 died from the vaccine in the 70's, while only 1 died from the flu.
-
Ron Paul is Great!
You conveniently left out the end of his comments, "but over 25 people died from the vaccine..." (the last swine-flu scare killed 1 person) What neo-con/neo-liberal think-tank do you work for?
radiofriendly 2 years ago 10
Out of the 27,717 cases of swine flu in the U.S., less than 1 percent have died.
Isnt there cost involved at personal level and for the society in large ? Treatment, hospitalization, medical bills, loss to time at work or at school, risk of transmitting that virus to other ?
The CDC? estimates that an average of 36,000 people die in the U.S. each year from the common flu.
So add more load to the health care system by the addition of 27,717 cases of swine flu ?
UnsavoryMen 2 years ago
You can have free speech all day long, I can have free speech to call you a douche.
In almost every video you post the same response could be posted. Ron Paul votes against it because it is unconstitutional.
You are either ignorant of the obvious or intentionally misleading. There is no third choice.
clearsky24 2 years ago 7
Ron Paul is against what ....? Even failing to mention what he is against on what subject matter is pretty douche...I presume. At least post it to a relevant video on what is against.
UnsavoryMen 2 years ago
This is idiocracy. The fact that you have made four of these videos coming after Ron Paul, let's me know for a fact that he is on the right track. I mean why would you be so eager to target him?
Sounds like we are finally getting some where.
clearsky24 2 years ago 2
Does anyone need any better reason to after someone's absurdity. In this case absurdities of an elected official.
Are Ron Paul supporters lobbying to get rid of free speech and right to express opinion specially when one disagrees with him on public policies?
UnsavoryMen 2 years ago