David Groves' Apollo 11 artificial light source
Loading...
Loading...
2,307
Loading...
10:00
Lunar Conspiracy - Part 1 of 5by tonlitt47,914 views- 9:59
Apollo Moon Hoax? Dr. David Groves Analysisby 1967jrewing271,197 views
- 10:59
MoonFaker: Radioactive Anomaly. PART 1.by WhiteJarrah15,108 views
- 9:51
What Happened On Moon - Part 2by trueMaster0918,102 views
- 10:20
MoonFaker: Exhibit D. PART 9.by WhiteJarrah2,950 views
- 7:58
Apollo 11 - The Untold Story (UFO encounters) Part 5 of 6by joszovko75,388 views
- 9:59
NEW Leaked Moon Landing Footage. Shows Hoax.by Lindasufos264,938 views
- 5:11
Apollo Moon Hoax new evidence HDby MrMoonhoax17,005 views
- 11:48
WILLIAM SHATNER WITNESSED HOAX TECH BEFORE APOLLO MOON MISSION-JOSH REEVESby dayglow7616,180 views
- 6:27
Apollo 11, The True Story of the Lunar Landingby BigDAS210,949 views
- 3:27
Apollo11'in aya iniş görüntüleriby abdullahtuna24,523 views
- 9:00
Moon Landing A Fake or Fact part1by itsmeraja007685,890 views
- 9:59
Hoaxed moon photos - Dr. David Groves analysisby joerogandotnet30,600 views
- 2:59
Moon Landing Hoax Apollo 11 : Hanging Stage Lights Are Seen Over the Fake Moon Modelby ArcAngel4Myke66,482 views
- 9:42
Moon Landing Hoax : Disney Made Apollo Rocks with Dogs & Cartoon Characters Hidden in Them (2 of 11)by ArcAngel4Myke3,535 views
- 7:21
Moon Landing Hoax - Wires Footage - Percy Debunkby LandingApollo48,077 views
- 5:34
MoonFaker: Exhibit D. PART 12.by WhiteJarrah1,545 views
- 5:18
Apollo wire evidence 1 part 3by Aurinkohirvi7,839 views
- 3:51
Mystery has no addressby won888der1,045 views
- 5:48
MSNBC Debates Moon Landing Hoax (2002)by ConspiracyWorld281,749 views
Jan Lundberg was an engineer not a scientist. And he did not say that the astronauts were in a spotlight. He said, it would seem that Armstrong stand in a spotlight and that he could not explain this.
Sounds a little bit different, right?
CHSarahBs 9 months ago
Jan Lundberg from Hasselblad said the astronauts were in the spotlight
Yes the scientist who Nasa asked to modify the cameras with they used
to Fake pictures on the Fake moon landings mocked Nasa
fuckutube74 11 months ago
@PsychoSpammer -- Yes. Rather than explaining how items appeared in the picture that could not possibly have been framed in the picture "from the base of the ladder" as you have insisted 5866 was taken from, how about if you just run away laughing like an idiot?
If 5866 were taken "from the base of the ladder" HOW did it include the side of the LM that was facing AWAY from the ladder?
You have no answer. So you just go away.
Bye.
nesokretep 1 year ago
Note Armstrong's position: He is standing well in the distance beyond the ladder.
Now look at picture 5866 from Apollo 11. It contains a portion of the "United States" sign on the far side of the LM. It also shows the base of the ladder, the base of the rocket engine nozzle, and the base of the strut on the far side of the ladder.
That picture is consistent with the position of Armstrong standing in full sun in this video.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@PsychoSpammer -- That is correct. He could not have been standing at the base of the ladder when he took that picture.
There are things in that picture that you could not possibly see from the base of the ladder.
The picture must have been taken from a position as far back from the ladder as the video shows Armstrong being.
Thank you.
nesokretep 1 year ago
@PsychoSpammer -- Most of Aldrin's descent is while Armstrong is on the other side of the ladder and you can't see his orientation.
In the video, the video camera, the ladder, and Armstrong are aligned.
In the picture that Armstrong took of Aldrin descending the ladder, the camera that Armstrong is holding, the ladder, and the strut that the video camera was mounted on are aligned.
The alignment of things is consistent between the video and the still photo.
nesokretep 1 year ago
APOLLO MOON HOAX
nasafakedit 1 year ago
@nasafakedit how gay
fiddlestickszz 1 year ago