Blood Diamond - Fight scene

Great scene.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• leonardo
• dicaprio
• blood
• diamond
• Djimon
• Hounsou
• fight

[babbawabbashabba]

@SLINGSBYFIREFLY Both of you... shut the fuck up.

[alashabibti]

@baked4211 It's a slur for black people. I think it originates from the Arabic word for "heathen", which was how monotheists such as Muslims thought of tribal Africans.

[TheOlipop123]

@DavidTheCatholic i could tell that you were black the moment you started to argue just jealous that a white man in a movie over powered a black man , quite pathetic if you ask me NO WAY A RUTHLESS SOLDIER WINS AGAINST A FISHERMAN FUCK NO REALLY , STUPID FUCKTARD

[TheOlipop123]

@DavidTheCatholic not sure if you know this but 32 battalion are known for their fast hard and aggressive training that included hand to hand combat they were very dangerous , had archer not drew his weapon he would have killed him with his bare hands but he needs solomon for the diamond so a gun in the face made a more passive cease to the fight.

[TheSirPrise]

@DavidTheCatholic What was the point of wasting energy on a prolonged and unnecessary wrestle?

[DavidTheCatholic]

@Sangrenegra9 Solomon knocked Archer about, Archer needed a gun to pacify him.

[Sangrenegra9]

@DavidTheCatholic - (continued) In any case, while Archer's rank is never made clear, what IS made clear is that he was a member of 32 Battalion - which as far as military units go were pretty tough. Since the officers and NCOs were all white, we can assume that Archer would be higher up than a private.

[Sangrenegra9]

@DavidTheCatholic - Going by your horseshit logic, an army composed entirely of Africans would beat any other army on Earth (WHOOPS didn't think so). The British Army might have tried recruiting Zulus instead of Gurkhas - which didn't happen of course.

Soldiers of African ancestry are no better or worse than their Caucasian or Asiatic brethren - the only variable is the training they receive. In this scenario, Archer has the training. Solomon doesn't. End of story.

[DavidTheCatholic]

@Sangrenegra9 Solomon was angry yes, but after he was punched in the gut, he picked up Archer slammed him to the floor, punched but was blocked, then strangled Archer, Archer punched him in the gut because he did not keep his vunerable places protected because he was so angry, which shows he was superior but angry. If Archer had no gun he would have lost. He took out the gun to control Solomon not to ''bring'' him to his senses, before he brought out the gun Solomon was about to attack again.

[DavidTheCatholic]

@Sangrenegra9 Wrong. Blacks are designed to fight and a lot of people have realised that, it was never discredited. Archer was a low ranking soldier, small. Solomon was a strong fisherman from a very harsh world.

[Sangrenegra9]

@DavidTheCatholic - We are discussing the characters in this scene. What on EARTH do the actors have to do with anything?

Solomon is meant to be a FISHERMAN. Archer is a SOLDIER. Like comparing a wooden spear with a tree branch for sharpness. Race is irrelevant - or are you being stupid on purpose?

Africans are no more 'designed' to fight than Asians are 'designed' to think, or Europeans are 'designed' to rule. Your 'facts' were discredited a long time ago.

[DavidTheCatholic]

@Sangrenegra9 Djibountu would win in a fight against Leonardo Dicaprio. Acting aside that's the fact of reality. So don't get happy over a movie.