Jeffreys vs Rubin 2003 US Open Chess Tournament
Loading...
Link to this comment:
Uploader Comments (mjshark)
Top Comments
-
Awesome I don't play chess but this was entertaining :)
3 years ago 5
-
man thats a good game ty for posting, but it was very hard to follow when your explanations were way out of sync with the pieces moving
1 year ago 3
All Comments (60)
-
he could have moved his rook between your two rooks, trading his rook and knight for one of your rooks and he would have avoided the coming checkmate
-
at 52 sec. you should of took his pawn
-
what happened at 2:17
2 years ago 2
-
he could of moved his rook
-
i think more coudve been done rather than resigning. they couldve traded pieces down to white only having 1 rook and the pawns and he couldve possibly worked his pawns down the board with the king protecting them. it might wouldve looked desperate but if he pulle d it off it wouldve been better than resigning...
-
Red arrows usually means there is something crucial that can be attacked, but is currently being blocked. Green arrows show threats that can happen immediately, and yellow I think just shows something you should be warned of.
-
excellent game.
-
Wasn't ...g6?! a blunder by him? Just look how White invaded those weak dark squares around his king!?
Especially since he played ...BxN, in combination with ...g6
that seems total suicide! I bet he underestimated the Colle
- 6:40Jeffreys vs Witten Winning Chess Combo!by mjshark26,821 views
- 6:17How to play the Colle Boring Opening like an An...by TimmyBx4,850 views
- 9:13A great opening for beating sub-2000 playersby Rickdd2460,581 views
- 9:51GM Alex Lenderman VS GM Mark Paragua at The Vil...by NewYorkCityChess3,699 views
- 0:44Checkmate in Four Movesby TheBowmoreWay396,706 views
- 9:30Chess Game Analysisby chessvideos120,328 views
- 9:49Phoenix Attack Variation of the Colle System (C...by fwqhgads11119,936 views
- 6:50Karpov - Kramnik (World Blitz Championship 2009)by MikhailKalenkov49,740 views
- 9:55Berman vs Jeffreys 2007 SMBCC Part 1*by mjshark2,186 views
- 7:24Willams vs. Zaloznyy Chess Palace 2003by mjshark10,327 views
- 9:48Traps in the Englund Gambit (1.d4 e5?!)by mjshark45,051 views
- 5:09Chess Opening: A Trap in the Torre Attackby GreenCastleBlock204,550 views
- 2:552009 Canadian Open Chess Tournamentby Zeljka75,315 views
- 3:10Nigel Davies - Colleby ChessBaseGmbH4,547 views
- 1:08Speed Chess Gameby pearlclouds1,543,849 views
- 9:38Chess Lesson: Scandinavian Defenceby jrobichess239,490 views
- 5:57Chess Problem: White to Play and Mate in 17by lachessleague7,264 views
- 8:33Chess Openings: The Queen's Gambitby thechesswebsite684,023 views
- 4:03A great chess tutorial - Two knights openingby 5minStudio906,462 views
At 3:25 black should have taken the knight with his bishop, because then the white knight is forced to take it back (or else Nxg4) rather than the f pawn (which opens up white's black-squared bishop).
Instead he left it too late and white was able to take with the f pawn giving him a much better position.
ivolol 4 years ago
Yes, you're right ivolol. My guess is that at the time he was reluctant to give up his dk. sq. bishop (his "good" bishop) and figured the other knight would only take its place.
However, this probably would have been better as he obviously changed his mind a few moves later and I was able to take with the f pawn and open up the c1-h6 diagonal for my dk. sq. bishop as you point out. :)
mjshark 4 years ago