40 Fallacies and Tactics Creationists use (And Why you should avoid them)
Uploader Comments (lapkine77)
All Comments (108)
-
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
-
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator.
-
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
-
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
-
WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! This Internet article describes how evolutionary scientists are disagreeing over all the "evidence" traditionally used to support macro-evolution. I have given over a dozen lectures, including before evolution science faculty and students, refuting macro-evolution. At the end I would answer questions and arguments from the audience. The science faculty was mostly silent. They knew enough science to understand what I was saying was true.
The truth is you pronounce the latin and greek terms perfectly, in their original pronunciation. However in different languages (including english) they are modified to be easy on the tongue. My first language is also really different from english (bulgarian) and the differences are staggering.
Great video btw, I really appreciate all the work you've put in it :)
Psykomancer 3 months ago
@Psykomancer Thanks. I'm nearly done on a similar project to this one if you are interested in learning 20 more fallacies creationists use :)
lapkine77 3 months ago
Now what am I supposed to do if someone rejects the validity of logical fallacies and thinks they can use them if they want?
GeneralInsomnia 3 months ago
@GeneralInsomnia Then they don't understand why the logic behind fallacies fails. If you have explained it to them but they don't care, it's because they are too stupid or arrogant to know better, either way they aren't interested in logical explanations and positions so no point in arguing further.
lapkine77 3 months ago
I watched the entire video O_O
LogicalThinker667 4 months ago
@LogicalThinker667 lol I hope you liked it ^_^
lapkine77 4 months ago