I think when people start to take a 'label' that they've given to a certain something (even widely accepted meanings and definitions), and go from that foundation they've built, to form OTHER hypothesis and understandings of social dynamics, they tend to lose sight of the original meaning. It almost evolves to fit perfectly into their own puzzle.
We tend to never flip back to the beginning to make sure that that meaning, that "label" was ever correct to begin with.
before i saw your video, i agreed with you that we are only doing things for aur selfs. But i am doubting now. Also we are a cooperation of cells.
All the cells are only looking for them selfes. I am not an individual cell, i am alreaddy an cooperation. And in a group we are not a pearson but a group. And the groep is selfish.
There is only a reason why we are not selfless ore selfish; we dont make the choise. It just happens. We act like an human becouse we are humans. That is no choise.illus
It's only difficult to grasp because simplification is required. To deduce. Keep asking "why?" to a particular matter involving social interaction & you'll eventually learn what Jasper digs.
Despite one's interests to interact & support others, that person still helps him/herself. Both parties (giver & reciever) benefit in various ways- ie: emotionally, materialistically, morally, etc.
would you consider "love" also being a form of "filling" the ego gaps?
now that word can be differently applied to many different people,but the basis of that word is that you do very willingly things for the other person without expecting something in return.what's your view?
You look like a typical new Yorker in this video...wow...Is that like, your Philosophical corner? You're always in the corner in your videos! lmfao. I swear, you're the next big thing to hit the human race in the face. Name? Avi. Cause? Dominating the minds of troubled beings, one youtube video at a time..
I think when people start to take a 'label' that they've given to a certain something (even widely accepted meanings and definitions), and go from that foundation they've built, to form OTHER hypothesis and understandings of social dynamics, they tend to lose sight of the original meaning. It almost evolves to fit perfectly into their own puzzle.
We tend to never flip back to the beginning to make sure that that meaning, that "label" was ever correct to begin with.
mangaas 1 year ago
before i saw your video, i agreed with you that we are only doing things for aur selfs. But i am doubting now. Also we are a cooperation of cells.
All the cells are only looking for them selfes. I am not an individual cell, i am alreaddy an cooperation. And in a group we are not a pearson but a group. And the groep is selfish.
There is only a reason why we are not selfless ore selfish; we dont make the choise. It just happens. We act like an human becouse we are humans. That is no choise.illus
een2iii 2 years ago
smart young man.
Logic3G 2 years ago
(cont)
It's only difficult to grasp because simplification is required. To deduce. Keep asking "why?" to a particular matter involving social interaction & you'll eventually learn what Jasper digs.
Efferts 2 years ago
I fully comprehend (me being an objectivist).
Despite one's interests to interact & support others, that person still helps him/herself. Both parties (giver & reciever) benefit in various ways- ie: emotionally, materialistically, morally, etc.
Efferts 2 years ago
would you consider "love" also being a form of "filling" the ego gaps?
now that word can be differently applied to many different people,but the basis of that word is that you do very willingly things for the other person without expecting something in return.what's your view?
negativecreep888 2 years ago
This is the 4th video I've seen of yours and I think I'm in love! Jokeing of course :)
RoundSquareX 2 years ago
He is a yankee that is why.
overmind25 2 years ago
I didn't know you talked so fast, heh.
Interesting. I agree with both of you at once. Does that make any sense? Oh my.
ninapoetry 2 years ago
You look like a typical new Yorker in this video...wow...Is that like, your Philosophical corner? You're always in the corner in your videos! lmfao. I swear, you're the next big thing to hit the human race in the face. Name? Avi. Cause? Dominating the minds of troubled beings, one youtube video at a time..
Jillersaurus 2 years ago